Polymarket had the chance to lead, but chose to follow noise instead of listening to actual traders. That's where things went wrong—prioritizing influencer hype over the people actually using the platform. A platform that truly scales needs to hear its users first.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockImposter
· 01-07 07:49
Listen to me, about Polymarket, it's a classic case of "picking up sesame seeds and losing watermelons." Constantly following big V influencers, resulting in losing real users.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-06 22:03
Listen, listen, about Polymarket... it's really a classic case of "self-censorship." Forcing their way into that influence game, treating genuine users as air. Is this okay? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 01-06 22:03
It sounds like the typical big platform syndrome... Influencer traffic > genuine user demand, I've seen this trick many times.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 01-06 21:57
Listen, Poly is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse... The loud voices of traffic stars are overshadowing the genuine players, and anyone would feel uncomfortable about this.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-06 21:44
NGL, Polymarket really underperformed this time. Listening to influencers instead of users will eventually lead the platform to fail.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 01-06 21:34
Really, Polymarket's move is a bit shady, listening to influencers and not users? Wake up, brother.
Polymarket had the chance to lead, but chose to follow noise instead of listening to actual traders. That's where things went wrong—prioritizing influencer hype over the people actually using the platform. A platform that truly scales needs to hear its users first.