2026-01-06 22:21:15

Recently, I came across a quite practical on-chain storage solution. To be honest, there is indeed a lack of such projects nowadays—no hype around concepts, just getting the work done.

The core pain points are just a few: high storage costs and slow data retrieval speeds. Using WAL to pay for storage costs is definitely cheaper compared to traditional methods. The node staking aspect is also interesting; token holders can directly receive profit sharing without the hassle of complex DeFi combinations.

The barrier to retail participation is also low. This is quite rare in the current market environment—so many projects are just focused on creating concepts, but what’s the result? Practical application scenarios are completely absent. This project has figured out the fundamental infrastructure issues and has visible execution power. How it develops later will depend on actual network adoption, but at least the approach is correct.

WAL1,4%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 01-09 22:21

Really? WAL Pay has something going on; finally, a project that's not just all PPTs.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 01-09 21:09

Finally seeing a project that doesn't just talk nonsense, this is the real deal --- WAL payments definitely save money, much cheaper than traditional solutions --- Basically, it's about returning to the core infrastructure itself, no more虚的 (虚的 means "empty" or "superficial" in this context) --- Node staking directly yields dividends, no need to play DeFi Lego, I love this approach --- The biggest concern is the adoption rate in the later stages, but at least it's not an empty shell --- Low barrier to retail investors is a plus, really rare --- Waiting to see how the network adoption rate turns out, having ideas alone isn't enough --- This is what truly solves the problem, not just some conceptual marketing strategy --- The high cost of storage is indeed a real pain point, they really targeted the issue --- I think it’s viable, but we need actual business volume to speak properly

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-09 18:22

Finally seeing projects that are not just blowing smoke, I'm really tired. --- The storage fee has always been a sore point. Using WAL this time is quite interesting, much cheaper than traditional solutions. --- Node staking directly shares the profits? Okay, this is a proper incentive mechanism, no need for me to research some crazy DeFi combinations. --- Can retail investors get in? It's easier to say than to do. Most projects simply don't care. --- The execution capability is here, mainly depends on whether it can be truly used later. It's still too early to tell. --- No concept, no gimmicks, just doing real work. This is a rare breed this year; I'm too lazy to pay attention to the虚的. --- Think through the problem thoroughly before doing it. I give this attitude a score. As for how far it can go, it depends on network adoption. --- I always feel that pragmatic projects like this are easily overlooked, while those hyping concepts every day tend to attract more attention. --- Low threshold is the hard truth. Most retail investors simply can't appreciate those complex combinations.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 01-08 05:37

Finally seeing a project that isn't just empty talk, I'm really exhausted.

View OriginalReply0

GasBankrupter

· 01-06 22:51

Storage fees are indeed being gouged heavily; this plan doesn't seem to be a scam. Projects that can truly do the work are too scarce; just earning without pretending. I like the low threshold; finally, there's a project that doesn't treat retail investors like fools. Adoption rate is the key; no matter how fancy the concept, it can't change the reality that the application scenarios are empty. WAL payment costs directly compare to traditional solutions? I give full marks for this idea, but it still depends on whether the network can be built up later.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 01-06 22:50

No hype, no negativity. Projects that are down-to-earth like this are indeed rare. Cutting storage costs significantly is the real value. Finally, someone is being genuine. Projects that only talk about concepts are really exhausting. Low threshold, direct earnings credited immediately—I'm convinced by this logic. Compared to those complicated DeFi operations, this is straightforward. A good project is one that solves real problems; all the flashy stuff is just fleeting. Honestly, whether it will succeed depends on adoption. But this approach is definitely on the right track. I'm just worried it might end up being just another concept pump, but from what I see so far, there is genuine sincerity. This is the kind of basic infrastructure development that should happen, but unfortunately, there are too few.

View OriginalReply0

LucidSleepwalker

· 01-06 22:45

Finally seeing a project that isn't just hype, storage really has potential. Honestly, these kinds of solutions that directly address problems are rare; I'm tired of all the concept hype. Can WAL reduce payment costs so much? That's interesting, worth following up. I'm just worried it might turn into a pure fundraising game later; network adoption rate is the key. The low threshold really hits the mark; retail investors finally don't have to play those complicated nested schemes anymore. The execution capability is there, much stronger than most projects. More practical projects like this should come more often; I'm tired of teams that talk nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainMessenger

· 01-06 22:33

Finally seeing someone who gets things done, no hype, no negativity. This is what we need. Storage has indeed been stuck for too long. If WAL payment costs can be so much cheaper, then hop on board quickly. Another reliable team. I won't say much else, let's see how the implementation goes. I'm just worried it might be just on paper; actual adoption rate is the real deal. I give extra points for being user-friendly for retail investors. I'm really tired of those high-threshold broken projects. Staking directly yields dividends, saving me from having to study those complex DeFi layers. Thanks. Infrastructure projects should be like this—no fancy tricks, just solving real problems. Looking forward to seeing real data.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-06 22:30

Honestly, I've seen quite a few projects like this, but truly practical ones are indeed rare. However, I have to give this idea a thumbs up. Finally, someone is taking storage seriously. Stop just hyping concepts every day. Can WAL payment costs be so much cheaper? There's something to it, definitely better than those pure air projects.

View OriginalReply0