Subscription-only content strategy bothers me. Here's why: it creates an information asymmetry that works against transparency. You see people flexing their subscription wins all over socials—chart calls, trading setups, market takes. But losses? Quietly buried. Nobody posts screenshots of wrong calls or portfolio tanks.
This selective broadcasting is why I stay skeptical about most paid services in crypto. Without seeing the full track record—wins AND losses—how do you really gauge accuracy? The model itself incentivizes cherry-picking results. Better model: publish your analysis openly, build credibility through real transparency, then people might actually value what you're offering.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NestedFox
· 01-07 15:18
That's right, paid content is just taking advantage of information asymmetry... The trades that Guangxiu makes, he runs away very quickly when he's losing. Who would believe that?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-06 23:56
NGL paid analysis is like this: if you make a profit, you share it; if you lose, you pretend to be dead. Who would believe that?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-06 23:55
Basically, paid content is just a celebration of information asymmetry. When you win, you show off everywhere; when you lose, you delete everything. Who would believe that?
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 01-06 23:47
Basically, everyone just wants to show off winning trades. Who the hell would want to post a loss screenshot...
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 01-06 23:46
ngl paid content is just a disguised way of cutting leeks, only showing the profits and never admitting losses... I just want to ask, why should I trust it?
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 01-06 23:41
Basically, paid content is just self-censorship—showing off when you win, and no one sees when you lose. I've seen this kind of operation too many times.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 01-06 23:40
Course sellers will never tell you about the losing trades. LOL
Paywalled Analysis: Worth the Hype?
Subscription-only content strategy bothers me. Here's why: it creates an information asymmetry that works against transparency. You see people flexing their subscription wins all over socials—chart calls, trading setups, market takes. But losses? Quietly buried. Nobody posts screenshots of wrong calls or portfolio tanks.
This selective broadcasting is why I stay skeptical about most paid services in crypto. Without seeing the full track record—wins AND losses—how do you really gauge accuracy? The model itself incentivizes cherry-picking results. Better model: publish your analysis openly, build credibility through real transparency, then people might actually value what you're offering.