According to reports from multiple media outlets in the finance and blockchain sectors, MSCI's final decision on whether digital currency treasury companies will be included in the index is expected to be announced externally on January 15, 2026. Once the proposal is approved, the corresponding adjustments will officially take effect during the index review period in February 2026.
**Timeline and Background of the Decision**
Last October, MSCI released a consultation document proposing a rather aggressive idea: removing companies with digital assets accounting for 50% or more of their total assets from the global investable market index. This document then entered a public consultation phase, with feedback collection ending at the end of 2025. Now, we await the final ruling on January 15. If approved, the February index rebalancing will exclude these companies.
**Potential Market Impact**
This proposal has caused quite a stir in the investment community, with a very active market response. Industry analysts generally believe that if this decision is implemented, it will trigger a massive outflow of passive funds. Specifically, according to BitcoinForCorporates' estimates, up to 39 companies could face withdrawal of passive funds totaling between $10 billion and $15 billion. Looking at individual companies, a report from JPMorgan pointed out that for large Bitcoin holders like Strategy, passive fund outflows related to MSCI indices alone could reach around $2.8 billion. This is just the direct impact; the ripple effects could be even more profound.
**Various Perspectives**
The controversy surrounding this proposal is significant, mainly revolving around a few core issues. First is the fundamental classification of companies—whether traditional listed companies holding digital assets should be considered "digital asset companies" is itself a contentious categorization.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropGrandpa
· 21h ago
January 15th will reveal all, will over 10 billion USD be dumped?
2. If this wave really gets kicked out, how many trapped investors will have to cut their losses?
3. Is MSCI just playing around here, is holding coins the original sin?
4. The 50% red line feels a bit harsh, traditional asset companies will all be caught in the crossfire.
5. Is the $2.8 billion data from JPMorgan really serious, or is it just alarmist talk again?
6. Wait, these guys are all studying January 15th, and we still have to wait almost a year...
7. Passive funds are fleeing this wave, retail investors will have to suffer the hits blindly.
8. Truly incredible, a well-listed company still gets delisted for holding coins, absurd.
9. Everyone has their own opinion, but in the end, it’s MSCI that calls the shots.
10. Uh, who set this classification standard? Feels like an open attack on digital assets.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-09 05:22
The decision on January 15th feels like it will stir up a lot of turbulence. Saying $10-15 billion is easy to talk about, but when it actually drops, it will be a different story.
If they really push through in February, we might be in for another bloody showdown.
Saying 50% and then kicking out, isn't that standard a bit too absolute... Traditional companies holding some BTC should be okay too?
Wait, that single $2.8 billion withdrawal from Strategy alone, plus the other 38 companies... this scale is a bit terrifying.
The controversy is real, but MSCI's move feels like drawing circles—are they trying to avoid risk, or is there real logic behind it?
Anyway, let's just wait until January 15th. By then, some will run, some will buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 01-07 01:50
Whoa, $15 billion poured in, how big of a hole does that create?
---
Just waiting for January 15th. If they really kick it out then, it’ll depend on who runs first.
---
MSCI’s move is ruthless, directly removing crypto companies from the index? Isn’t that a form of indirect suppression?
---
$2.8 billion just disappeared, companies like Strategy must be panicking.
---
The question is how to define "digital asset companies." It feels like they’re just looking for an excuse to clear the market.
---
Two months of preparation, 39 companies all sliding down. Let’s see how the market recovers then.
---
Passive funds are the main players. When things really go south, active funds will have to start selling too.
---
If that really happens, the sell-off in February will be intense—get ready with your chopping knives.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvester
· 01-07 01:50
A surprise attack, the crypto world is about to be stirred up again?
Wait, $15 billion poured out, that must be really painful...
MSCI really dares to cut directly by kicking out 39 companies? I don't understand why it has to be so absolute.
Oh my, February might see another plunge, better to buy the dip early or run early...
I think, these people just haven't understood the definition of the crypto world.
Everyone's waiting for January 15th, this period must be so hard to endure...
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-07 01:44
Wait, is MSCI really going to kick these companies out? How much did those 39 companies lose? Are they just going to lose 10-15 billion dollars?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-07 01:39
Wait, is it really scheduled for January 15th? If it really passes, how disastrous will the February sell-off be... 39 companies with 10-15 billion USD outflows, how can that be tolerated?
According to reports from multiple media outlets in the finance and blockchain sectors, MSCI's final decision on whether digital currency treasury companies will be included in the index is expected to be announced externally on January 15, 2026. Once the proposal is approved, the corresponding adjustments will officially take effect during the index review period in February 2026.
**Timeline and Background of the Decision**
Last October, MSCI released a consultation document proposing a rather aggressive idea: removing companies with digital assets accounting for 50% or more of their total assets from the global investable market index. This document then entered a public consultation phase, with feedback collection ending at the end of 2025. Now, we await the final ruling on January 15. If approved, the February index rebalancing will exclude these companies.
**Potential Market Impact**
This proposal has caused quite a stir in the investment community, with a very active market response. Industry analysts generally believe that if this decision is implemented, it will trigger a massive outflow of passive funds. Specifically, according to BitcoinForCorporates' estimates, up to 39 companies could face withdrawal of passive funds totaling between $10 billion and $15 billion. Looking at individual companies, a report from JPMorgan pointed out that for large Bitcoin holders like Strategy, passive fund outflows related to MSCI indices alone could reach around $2.8 billion. This is just the direct impact; the ripple effects could be even more profound.
**Various Perspectives**
The controversy surrounding this proposal is significant, mainly revolving around a few core issues. First is the fundamental classification of companies—whether traditional listed companies holding digital assets should be considered "digital asset companies" is itself a contentious categorization.