There's been a stark contrast lately between how different projects have handled their token launches. While several initiatives struggled significantly during their ICO phases—each facing their own set of challenges—one team managed something pretty impressive: smashing through their 2.5M funding cap and raising 10M instead.



What explains this gap? The difference often comes down to fundamentals. Projects that maintain transparency, deliver on commitments, and build genuine community trust tend to see completely different outcomes than those that cut corners or overpromise.

The takeaway isn't complicated: authentic execution beats hype every single time. If you're evaluating tokens and projects, reputation matters more than most people think. The teams that actually follow through don't just survive—they thrive.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektHuntervip
· 01-09 21:14
Honestly, projects that can oversubscribe by 4 times really just have solid fundamentals; there's nothing mysterious about it.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleepsvip
· 01-07 11:12
To be honest, those projects with explosive funding really have some skills; it's not something you can achieve a 4x funding boost just by bragging.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-07 01:55
In plain terms, the projects that actually get things done and dominate are the winners, while the hype merchants all end up crashing and burning.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971vip
· 01-07 01:48
Basically, only a reliable team can make money; those deceptive projects will eventually fail.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 01-07 01:47
In plain terms, it's that old saying — a reliable team will really win. The gap between 10M and 2.5M looks like someone is genuinely working while others are just making empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-07 01:42
In simple terms, a reliable team can really raise four times the funding, no matter how much the air project is hyped up, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrowniesvip
· 01-07 01:35
Honestly, this is the real deal. Reliable teams are never short of money, and no matter how much they boast about bad projects, it’s useless.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHuntervip
· 01-07 01:32
Honestly, reliable projects are really scarce these days. The 4x funding gap says it all. As always, you need something genuine.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 01-07 01:28
Basically, it's about reputation being valuable. Those bragging projects will eventually crash and burn.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)