The world's largest index provider MSCI recently announced a key decision—temporarily retaining listed companies heavily invested in crypto assets within the global investable market indices. This shift directly alleviates the risk of capital outflows faced by companies like MicroStrategy. Following the announcement, MicroStrategy's stock price surged nearly 7% after hours.
In October last year, MSCI initiated a consultation plan to remove Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies from its indices. The rationale at the time was that these companies, holding large amounts of crypto assets, exhibited characteristics similar to investment funds and might no longer meet the traditional inclusion criteria for listed company indices. MSCI even proposed specific recommendations: companies with crypto holdings exceeding 50% of total assets should be excluded.
If this policy is implemented, the market expects nearly a hundred billion USD in passive fund outflows. The change in this decision stems from intensive communication with global institutional investors—generally, the investment community believes that the line between "operating companies" and "investment tools" is not so clear-cut. Faced with this disagreement, MSCI ultimately chose to maintain the status quo, allowing these digital asset companies to remain in the index constituents.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWaster
· 01-07 02:46
MSCI's move this time is really awesome, almost pushed MicroStrategy out, luckily they didn't go all the way, or how much would they have to run?
View OriginalReply0
BoredStaker
· 01-07 02:45
Haha, MSCI really chickened out this time. Under the pressure of hundreds of millions of dollars, they still had to bow down.
MicroStrategy dodged a bullet again this time. It cracked me up.
Wait, they said "the boundaries are unclear"... So when will they be clear? Probably never be able to define them clearly.
It's a good hand, just keep the status quo directly, investors will be happy and the financial reports will look good.
I don't understand this logic. Are we holding coins for investment or operation... So funny.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-07 02:42
MSCI's move this time is really saving the day at a critical moment, otherwise large holders like MicroStrategy would be in trouble.
Almost got cut by a hundred billion dollars, luckily institutions have the say, otherwise this index adjustment would be a joke.
Bet right, coin-holding companies continue to stay in the index, passive funds still have to honestly follow the buying.
This is the power of scale; if MicroStrategy and others weren't big enough, they wouldn't be able to turn this market.
Institutional investors speaking up = rule changes, it's really just a matter of one sentence.
Fortunately, MSCI didn't push too hard, or else this credit would completely collapse.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 01-07 02:36
Damn, if it weren't for the institutions desperately trying to hold, MicroStrategy would have been gone long ago.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 01-07 02:28
MicroStrategy dodged another bullet this time. Has MSCI really backed down? It seems like the big institutional players still want to hold tight to crypto.
The world's largest index provider MSCI recently announced a key decision—temporarily retaining listed companies heavily invested in crypto assets within the global investable market indices. This shift directly alleviates the risk of capital outflows faced by companies like MicroStrategy. Following the announcement, MicroStrategy's stock price surged nearly 7% after hours.
In October last year, MSCI initiated a consultation plan to remove Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies from its indices. The rationale at the time was that these companies, holding large amounts of crypto assets, exhibited characteristics similar to investment funds and might no longer meet the traditional inclusion criteria for listed company indices. MSCI even proposed specific recommendations: companies with crypto holdings exceeding 50% of total assets should be excluded.
If this policy is implemented, the market expects nearly a hundred billion USD in passive fund outflows. The change in this decision stems from intensive communication with global institutional investors—generally, the investment community believes that the line between "operating companies" and "investment tools" is not so clear-cut. Faced with this disagreement, MSCI ultimately chose to maintain the status quo, allowing these digital asset companies to remain in the index constituents.