Have you ever seen lending platforms with annual interest rates of 8%, 10% and then quietly closed the app?
Here's an interesting contrast: some leading DeFi lending protocols actually have interest rates around 1%.
This is not accidental. The underlying logic is simple—when governance token holders control the interest rate pricing, the entire ecosystem's cost structure is completely rewritten.
**Who makes the decisions on traditional lending platforms?** The platform itself. You have no choice but to accept it.
**What about decentralized lending protocols?** If the community votes that "interest rates should be lowered to attract users," then the rates can be pushed down. Low interest rates are essentially a collective community decision.
So how does this ultra-low borrowing cost actually make money?
**First opportunity: cross-platform interest rate arbitrage** Borrow stablecoins at 1% cost, deposit them into an exchange or other platform earning 10%+ annualized returns—this isn't high-level arbitrage, just pure interest rate transfer, with even lower risk.
**Second opportunity: maintaining growth** Stake BNB or its derivatives, lend out funds at very low interest to mine, participate in liquidity mining, or other investments, while still holding the core assets. During a bull market, this approach maintains upside exposure while preserving liquidity flexibility.
**Third opportunity: governance dividends** Locking governance tokens not only grants voting rights but also allows sharing in protocol transaction fees or other revenues. Your voting power is linked to your yield.
The core of this model is: governance rights shift from passive ownership to active income tools.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xTherapist
· 01-08 07:55
1% lending rate sounds like the prelude to a rug pull... but think about it carefully, the interest rate arbitrage strategy is indeed ruthless.
2. Using governance tokens as ATMs—that's the true imagination of Web3.
3. To put it simply, it's still that old, tired logic: low interest rates attract people in, but in the end, the retail investors are still the ones getting hurt.
4. Cross-platform arbitrage: borrowing at 1% and earning 10%—that's outrageous... Is the risk really low?
5. Voting rights can be linked to dividends? Feels like gambling with a different name—financial management.
6. In DeFi, the most skilled at arbitrage are the big players; retail investors can only watch from the sidelines.
7. Community voting to cut interest rates sounds democratic, but in reality, it's the whales calling the shots.
8. Holding a position during a bull market and borrowing to mine— isn't that leverage? What about the risk?
9. Compared to an 8% annual yield, 1% is even more terrifying—meaning there's no problem at all.
10. Linking governance rights to returns? Interesting, but if this continues, could it turn into a power game?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 01-07 17:01
Wow, a 1% lending rate—that's why I refuse to let go of governance tokens.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-07 03:50
Wait, can the 1% lending rate really last? It feels like a false prosperity created by throwing governance tokens around.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 01-07 03:43
Wow, a 1% lending rate—aren't you just giving away money for free? The community voting move is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-07 03:27
Wait, can a 1% borrowing cost really be profitable through interest rate spreads? It feels too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 01-07 03:25
Wow, 1% lending cost? This gameplay is really clever. I just realized I've been bleeding from traditional platforms all along.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 01-07 03:23
Oh, a 1% interest rate? I see through this trick—it's just using retail investors' say as leverage. The words sound nice, but the real beneficiaries are the big players.
Have you ever seen lending platforms with annual interest rates of 8%, 10% and then quietly closed the app?
Here's an interesting contrast: some leading DeFi lending protocols actually have interest rates around 1%.
This is not accidental. The underlying logic is simple—when governance token holders control the interest rate pricing, the entire ecosystem's cost structure is completely rewritten.
**Who makes the decisions on traditional lending platforms?** The platform itself. You have no choice but to accept it.
**What about decentralized lending protocols?** If the community votes that "interest rates should be lowered to attract users," then the rates can be pushed down. Low interest rates are essentially a collective community decision.
So how does this ultra-low borrowing cost actually make money?
**First opportunity: cross-platform interest rate arbitrage**
Borrow stablecoins at 1% cost, deposit them into an exchange or other platform earning 10%+ annualized returns—this isn't high-level arbitrage, just pure interest rate transfer, with even lower risk.
**Second opportunity: maintaining growth**
Stake BNB or its derivatives, lend out funds at very low interest to mine, participate in liquidity mining, or other investments, while still holding the core assets. During a bull market, this approach maintains upside exposure while preserving liquidity flexibility.
**Third opportunity: governance dividends**
Locking governance tokens not only grants voting rights but also allows sharing in protocol transaction fees or other revenues. Your voting power is linked to your yield.
The core of this model is: governance rights shift from passive ownership to active income tools.