Recently, a high-profile case has attracted attention: Manus, a Chinese AI company acquired by Meta for $2 billion, suddenly fell into an investigation controversy. The Financial Times disclosed that the Chinese Ministry of Commerce has initiated a review process, focusing on whether the company bypassed relevant export control requirements when transferring employees and technology to Singapore.
Although it is still in the early stages of investigation, if it is ultimately determined that an export license is required, it could directly impact the progress of this acquisition. In extreme cases, it could even lead to the deal falling through. This has led many to consider: in the current complex policy environment, how many pitfalls must cross-border tech mergers and acquisitions navigate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomHunter
· 01-08 22:32
Ha, 2 billion USD is so uncertain now, export controls are really harsh.
---
Regarding technology transfer, it seems we need to be cautious. Moving to Singapore isn't as simple as just wanting to go.
---
If the project fails, Meta will suffer a huge loss. The policy window is closing tighter and tighter.
---
It feels like now when doing cross-border mergers and acquisitions, you should ask legal first and finance second.
---
Manus really started high and then fell low. Who would have thought the review would come so quickly?
---
The slot map has to be drawn on the table now; there are too many variables.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-08 19:03
2 billion USD just gone like that, hilarious. Export controls are really unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 01-08 12:48
actually, if you run the numbers on regulatory risk premiums for cross-border tech m&a right now, the basis points are absolutely wild. manus case is textbook market inefficiency waiting to get arbitraged
Reply0
MEVHunterWang
· 01-07 06:53
Ha, Manus this thing is really dramatic, 2 billion is just hanging in the air, Meta is also quite unlucky
I told you, cross-border mergers and acquisitions are like walking on a minefield, every step could explode
Someone should have warned these companies that every tech move needs to be carefully considered
The tech war plus export controls, companies caught in the middle are really in a tough spot
If this fails, it will be so embarrassing
Still thinking about secretly moving people and technology, did you never consider what comes next?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 01-07 06:50
2 billion USD just gone like that? That's hilarious. Policies are really unpredictable and unavoidable.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 01-07 06:30
2 billion USD can disappear just like that; censorship is really something that can slap you in the face at any time.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 01-07 06:26
Wow, Meta must be worried now—there's a chance of wasting 2 billion dollars.
Recently, a high-profile case has attracted attention: Manus, a Chinese AI company acquired by Meta for $2 billion, suddenly fell into an investigation controversy. The Financial Times disclosed that the Chinese Ministry of Commerce has initiated a review process, focusing on whether the company bypassed relevant export control requirements when transferring employees and technology to Singapore.
Although it is still in the early stages of investigation, if it is ultimately determined that an export license is required, it could directly impact the progress of this acquisition. In extreme cases, it could even lead to the deal falling through. This has led many to consider: in the current complex policy environment, how many pitfalls must cross-border tech mergers and acquisitions navigate.