2026-01-07 10:51:04

Let's review the trading record from Wednesday. The short position was placed at 3272, exited at 3199, earning 73 points. The position was held for a short time, and the execution was decisive. A contract from a certain leading exchange also moved along with it, sweeping through the 7110 level; I won't go into the details.

In the middle, I remembered a saying—fate, this playwright, might indeed be unreliable, but you can choose to be the protagonist of your own story. Trading is the same; you can't always control how the market moves, but risk management, stop-loss, and take-profit discipline for each trade are things you can decide.

By the way, recently the SEC has been pushing forward with plans for tokenized stock trading, and the overall compliance direction of the market is becoming clearer. The regulatory framework for digital assets is gradually improving, which is a positive signal for long-term participants.

#美国证券交易委员会代币化股票交易方案 $BTC The future development still depends on the coordination of macroeconomic factors and on-chain data. Let's keep observing.

BTC-0,04%

ETH-0,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningAllInHero

· 6h ago

Run at 73 points, this move is indeed stable. However, I think we still need to wait for the SEC's tokenized stock plan; it will take about two years to actually implement.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 12h ago

Run with just 73 points, your speed is indeed impressive, but I still want to know how that wave of 7110 was swept. Details are the real skills, right?

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 01-08 15:57

Running at just 73 points, this technique is indeed clean... But that part about the fate's scriptwriter, why does it sound a bit like chicken soup, haha. It's true that improving the compliance framework is important, but can retail investors really reap the benefits, or is it just another new way to harvest the little guys? Looking at the on-chain data, I’m convinced—it's much more reliable than all those shouting buy signals on the screen.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyUpOnly

· 01-07 11:21

Withdraw at 73 points, this discipline is really top-notch. People who are not greedy live longer.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 01-07 11:20

Only 73 points to go, this skill is really steady If the SEC's policies really come into effect, our lives will be much better Fate is a poor playwright, we have to take the pen ourselves — I love to hear that Can BTC break through this time? Feels like it's still entangled

View OriginalReply0

HodlOrRegret

· 01-07 11:19

73 points just run away, this move makes me feel like I’m a bit disappointed in earning so little haha --- SEC’s progress really looks the same year after year, I actually am optimistic about the gradual implementation of the compliance framework --- Risk management is right to talk about, but it still depends on mindset. When losses happen, anyone will waver --- From 3272 to 3199... Well, speaking easily, in actual operation, not being shaken out already means you’ve won --- That part about fate is a bit motivational, but trading is really like that. The only thing you can do is stick to discipline --- Wait, was your contract at 7110 swept up or swept out? The details are way too different

View OriginalReply0

TokenSleuth

· 01-07 11:06

Running at 73 points, this move is really well-calculated. The SEC is really taking action; it seems that compliance is already the general trend. As expected, you still need to control your own risks; fate cannot provide this.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 01-07 10:57

Running at 73 points, your courage is really too small haha --- SEC's whole routine, honestly, is just trying to siphon profits from our pockets --- Good talk on risk management, but basically it's just being too cowardly to hold positions --- Improving the compliance framework? I think it's just perfecting the harvesting system --- From 3272 to 3199, I was also in this wave, but I didn't run so early, still debating now --- I agree that fate is unreliable, but the discipline of stop-loss and take-profit is even more unreliable --- When will the actions of the leading exchange at 7110 be publicly disclosed? --- On-chain data combined with macro? I only look at candlestick charts to speak --- This order was executed smoothly, but I really want to see how you handle losses

View OriginalReply0