U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott is moving to force a markup vote on a major crypto market-structure bill scheduled for January 15th. The legislation mirrors the House's approach, aiming to redistribute regulatory oversight between the SEC and CFTC based on asset classification standards. However, the bill faces mounting internal resistance. Key sticking points include how DeFi protocols should be regulated, the proper classification and oversight of stablecoins, and ongoing ethical concerns about market structure. Whether this markup will ultimately lead to floor passage remains uncertain, with divisions within the committee threatening to derail momentum on what could be a landmark framework for crypto market governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SybilAttackVictim
· 9h ago
Is Tim Scott trying to push it through forcibly? The DeFi and stablecoin sectors will definitely still face battles.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 01-08 13:12
Here we go again, DeFi and stablecoins are still fighting each other.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 01-07 17:01
Here we go again, DeFi regulation is still not clear, and stablecoins are stuck again. It's really a Russian nesting doll-style mess.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 01-07 17:01
Another big Bitcoin. The disagreement between DeFi and stablecoins is really a tough nut to crack.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 01-07 17:00
It's the same old tune from the SEC and CFTC; they haven't figured out how to regulate DeFi yet.
---
Regarding stablecoin classification, I think we're going to argue about it for a long time.
---
Will it pass on January 15? I'm skeptical; the committee is too divided.
---
If this bill really gets pushed through, stablecoins will have a future.
---
Another round of regulatory drama, but it's better than no regulation at all.
---
The market governance framework sounds good, but I'm afraid it will end up just talk on paper.
---
DeFi will definitely be a point of contention again; no one can clarify it.
---
The internal disagreements are so big that the floor passage is hanging in the balance.
---
Regulation of stablecoins is the most critical; everything else is just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 01-07 17:00
What is Tim Scott up to now? This time he's trying to divide the power between DeFi and stablecoins... Haven't the SEC and CFTC finished their fight yet?
View OriginalReply0
TaxEvader
· 01-07 16:59
Tim Scott is at it again. Will he be able to push this time? Feels like he's going to get stuck again in DeFi.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-07 16:56
It's the same old script from the SEC and CFTC again. Do they really think changing the classification will solve DeFi? You're overthinking it...
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-07 16:36
It's the same old tune again—SEC vs CFTC power struggle. Do they really think of DeFi as anything special?
U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott is moving to force a markup vote on a major crypto market-structure bill scheduled for January 15th. The legislation mirrors the House's approach, aiming to redistribute regulatory oversight between the SEC and CFTC based on asset classification standards. However, the bill faces mounting internal resistance. Key sticking points include how DeFi protocols should be regulated, the proper classification and oversight of stablecoins, and ongoing ethical concerns about market structure. Whether this markup will ultimately lead to floor passage remains uncertain, with divisions within the committee threatening to derail momentum on what could be a landmark framework for crypto market governance.