2026-01-07 18:23:45

The transparency issue of crowdfunding financing has always been a pain point in the investment community. Startup project parties hold informational advantages, while investors often fall into the dilemma of information asymmetry—difficulty in verifying financial data, unclear equity distribution, and confusing dividend payouts.

Walrus offers a programmable solution. Project parties can directly store key documents such as business plans and financial statements on Walrus, ensuring data immutability. Investors participate in financing through smart contracts, with the entire process automated—equity registration and dividend distribution are determined by code, leaving no room for manipulation.

The biggest advantage of this on-chain crowdfunding protocol is the elimination of human manipulation. There is no space for back-end ledger tampering or behind-the-scenes operations. WAL token holders are both participants and overseers. For investors looking to protect their rights and interests, this is a new approach worth paying attention to.

WAL-0,68%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWatcher

· 01-09 22:32

Finally someone has exposed this issue... I'm really fed up with those black-box financing methods. --- Code doesn't lie, but people do... That's the real point. --- Wait, how do WAL holders ensure they won't unite to bully small investors? --- Automatic profit sharing via smart contracts? Sounds good, but who pays the gas fees? --- Compared to flashy promises, I just want to see if there are real cases that can run smoothly. --- I trust on-chain transparency, but once project teams put their data on the chain, it's already decided. Isn't that still about sincerity? --- I have to say, compared to traditional financing tricks, this approach is much cleaner. --- This is what true on-chain governance looks like. Other projects should learn from it. --- The problem is, big investors already understand the profit-sharing logic, while small investors are still blindly guessing. --- They've closed the loophole to modify the ledger, but what about changing the contract logic itself... Am I overthinking? --- Finally, some projects remember that investors are people, not just cash cows.

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 01-09 15:18

Now someone finally dares to put the ledger on the chain, but the real problem is that most people still can't read code. Smart contracts sound impressive, but the audit fees are another confusing issue. Walrus's approach indeed hits the pain points, finally creating a mechanism that prevents project teams from playing tricks. That said, on-chain transparency also depends on whether the holders are rational enough; otherwise, you're still at risk of being exploited. Code is law sounds great, but only if you trust the person who wrote the code. Honestly, investors now are like choosing how to be scammed—whether by centralized deception or on-chain deception.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-09 03:20

On-chain crowdfunding sounds good, but it just feels like another new way to scam investors.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 01-08 05:45

Someone finally explained this thoroughly; on-chain crowdfunding is truly a savior for the investment community. Code doesn't lie, and ledgers can't be altered—that's what Web3 should be doing. Wait, what's the current price of WAL? I need to find out before I say anything. But on the other hand, those shady practices by project teams in the past were really exhausting. Now I can finally sleep peacefully. If this thing really takes off, traditional crowdfunding platforms will be panicked. Smart contract automatic dividends? Sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another PPT coin. I feel like the Walrus idea has some potential; worth paying attention to. I've been waiting for someone to solve this problem with blockchain. It's finally happening.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 01-07 18:54

It sounds ideal, but the key question is whether the storage layer of Walrus itself has been audited. No matter how powerful the smart contract is, if the data source is compromised, the entire system is useless.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-07 18:53

Finally someone has made transparency happen. The losses from being exploited a couple of years ago were devastating. Walrus, this thing, the code is law, no one can tamper with it. That's what I want. By the way, what is the current price of the WAL token? Is it a good time to get in? Dividend distribution through smart contracts is a hundred times better than old-fashioned front-running. Now investors can finally hold their heads high and no longer have to look at the project team's face. But the key still depends on whether big projects are coming on-chain; otherwise, it's just an empty shell. Funding transparency should have come long ago. No wonder the market has always lacked trust.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a180694b

· 01-07 18:48

To be honest, I've heard this logic too many times. It sounds great that code decides everything, but when it comes down to it? It feels like shifting trust from people to code, but code can also have bugs. If this can really be implemented, traditional crowdfunding models will be trembling. Anyway, I think on-chain transparency is just superficial; the biggest concern is that the project itself might be a scam. Wait, the real issue is actually the timeliness of information disclosure. Can Walrus really solve this? This direction is promising, but it depends on how it's actually implemented. We can't just listen to stories.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-07 18:41

Sounds good, but I still have some doubts... Can it really eliminate all manipulation? --- Code is also written by humans. What if bugs can't be fixed? --- Finally, someone is doing serious work. I am willing to test this system. --- Wait, smart contracts can also be attacked. Isn't that still a risk? --- On-chain transparency is good, but how can the project's initial data be guaranteed to be genuine? --- WAL's token value is another story, but at least the idea truly addresses the pain points. --- Brothers, don't be too optimistic. The difficulty of implementation might be much greater than you think. --- It should have been done this way a long time ago. Traditional financing is really a pile of crap. --- Here's the question: will regulators allow this kind of model? --- Code is law sounds great, but who is responsible if something goes wrong?

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 01-07 18:37

It sounds nice, but I bet five bucks that the next "on-chain transparent" project will still blow up...

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 01-07 18:35

On-chain crowdfunding sounds good in theory, but how many projects can actually be implemented? --- Code determines dividends? Well, it depends on who writes the code haha --- Finally, someone wants to make transparency a priority, which is a hundred times better than those projects that just keep making empty promises --- Smartcontract does not equal smart people; it still depends on whether the core team is reliable --- WAL holders are both participants and supervisors? Dual roles also mean dual risks --- Immutability ≠ projects won't run away; don't confuse these two concepts --- Recently, several crowdfunding projects have just disappeared again; blockchain can't change human greed --- This system is indeed friendly to retail investors, but how do institutions play along? --- The direction of financial transparency is correct; it all depends on whether Walrus infrastructure can truly be stable --- No doubt, but we still need to be cautious of high-yield crowdfunding projects

View OriginalReply0