2026-01-07 20:22:58

Today, another short position has been secured! The target is set at the 100,000 mark, continuing to push upward.

The recent market pace has indeed been a bit slow, but there is still room—about 100 points of operational space. The strategy was planned in advance before the market fully unfolded, and the subsequent operational logic has been transparently executed. I keep my promises, with no half-measures.

$BTC $ETH

BTC-0,43%

ETH-0,98%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProxyCollector

· 3h ago

100,000 threshold? Bro, this pace is a bit rushed.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-09 04:29

ngl, the "100 points of space" narrative hits different when you've watched liquidity fragment across 4 different bridges... been there, seen the exploit postmortems. transparency's cute but slippage tolerance got me worried here

Reply0

FromMinerToFarmer

· 01-07 20:51

Shorting again and making a profit? Why do I keep missing out?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-07 20:45

Are you trying to push the market at the 100,000 level? The market hasn't moved yet, haha.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-07 20:39

Secure your gains and enjoy stable happiness

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-07 20:35

Can the 100,000 threshold really be maintained? I'm skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 01-07 20:33

Just cash out, no need for that transparent talk.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHermit

· 01-07 20:31

Secure the bag, this is the true way The market is slow to return, but those who understand the rhythm are all making gains Wait, can the 100,000 level really hold? Transparency in execution sounds good, but how do we verify it? This wave of BTC is interesting, let's keep watching

View OriginalReply0