U.S. Vice President JD Vance's recent remarks have attracted significant attention in the market. He candidly stated that cryptocurrencies have become part of the mainstream economic system and will not disappear, only continue to exist. This high-level statement from the White House undoubtedly sends an important signal — digital assets are gaining clearer political and institutional recognition.
This is not just a change in attitude. In fact, U.S. crypto policy has been quietly adjusting for some time. The approval of Bitcoin spot ETFs, the practical application of stablecoins in cross-border payments, and the continuous influx of institutional funds all demonstrate a fact: crypto assets are gradually evolving from "pure speculation" into fundamental financial tools. The regulatory environment is also moving from previous uncertainty toward greater clarity.
From a functional perspective, the roles that cryptocurrencies now play have become more practical. Store of value, payment settlement, clearing networks, decentralized financial infrastructure — these are no longer just concepts within the crypto community but are penetrating into traditional finance, large tech companies, and even global trade. Policymakers are also beginning to realize that since this industry exists, it deserves serious attention.
From a competitive standpoint, the adjustment of U.S. policy also reflects a realistic consideration. Countries around the world are vying for the high ground in digital finance. If the U.S. chooses to suppress it in the long term, innovation will flow outward; instead, incorporating it into a regulatory framework can both control risks and support industry development. Why not do both?
When even the Vice President publicly states "cryptocurrency is mainstream," the narrative of the entire industry has undergone a fundamental shift. The next discussion will no longer focus on "whether it should exist," but rather on "how to regulate, how to expand, and how to deepen integration with the traditional system."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostAddressMiner
· 21h ago
Vans' words... seem nice, but it all depends on the flow of funds. I've tracked the USDC addresses involved in institutional entries, and the suspicion level is quite high.
Wait, the White House suddenly speaks out—do they really want to embrace, or are they trying to manipulate the pricing power? I bet five Bitcoin it's the latter.
Is the US policy "quietly adjusting"? No, it's just a time gap for retail investors to set up. The moment ETF approval was granted, some dormant wallets started to move, and I have data to prove it.
The key question is—who benefits? It’s definitely not us retail investors. Do you really understand what regulation means? It means that compliant big funds can safely dump, while retail investors' exit routes are being blocked one by one.
"Deep integration" sounds good, but what kind of integration? From a technical perspective, they pretend not to see the centralized risks of stablecoins. Is this called integration? I scoff.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 01-10 12:32
Vans is right, it’s about time, the crypto world is finally breaking through
Mainstream acceptance is no longer a dream, institutions are pouring real money in, I’m just waiting for regulations to be implemented
It sounds nice, but in reality, it’s just the US trying to hold onto the discourse power
Now those who shouted "cryptos are doomed" should shut up, it’s a policy issue, not a faith issue
To put it simply, the US doesn’t want to be left behind, this government has finally woken up
Wait, is this about integrating the crypto industry into the system or a disguised form of harvesting? It doesn’t seem that simple...
Mainstream acceptance actually means you need to be cautious, regulations also imply restrictions, a double-edged sword, everyone
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 01-09 21:10
Vans' words can be seen as a reassurance to the industry, but honestly, it's a bit late for politicians to react now.
This wave clearly shows that the US is playing chess; rather than blocking, it's better to cooperate, right? Anyway, technology can't be stopped.
Institutional funds entering the market indicate that big things are already decided; it's no longer just retail players.
It's called integration in a nice way, but in reality, it's just about grabbing this piece of the cake—America's old trick.
Wait, haven't we already seen through this logic? It's just that the White House has now given its nod and confirmation.
The turn of events came a bit suddenly—last year they were suppressing, and this year it has become mainstream. Truly unpredictable.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperer
· 01-07 21:49
Vans' recent statements indeed broke the deadlock. The previous "ban theory" was ultimately a joke.
Honestly, the endorsement from the White House should have come a long time ago. I really don't understand why they pretended not to see it before.
Now, it's all good. No more listening to those old tunes of "Bitcoin is a scam." It's time to move forward.
Institutional funds are already pouring in. Are you still debating whether they exist? It's time to think about how to get on board.
The US has taken a tough stance on regulation—blocking strategically without completely shutting it down. They really have some skills.
Finally, there's no need to discuss crypto in secret. Talking openly about mainstream adoption feels completely different.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDream
· 01-07 21:49
Vans' words are indeed harsh. The White House officially announces the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency, now we can speak confidently.
---
It was about time to say this, otherwise the US would really be pulled down.
---
Oh my, this pace feels like a big explosion is not far away.
---
Sounds good, but the key still depends on when the follow-up implementation will happen.
---
That's incredible. Previously suppressing and now embracing, this contrast is a bit刺激.
---
But regulation and support are indeed a choice between two, a smart choice.
---
Here it comes, a major shift in mainstream narrative, this is what we've been waiting for.
---
Institutional funds are really coming in continuously. I can feel the rhythm has changed.
---
Once the regulatory framework is established, risks will be controllable. This logic makes sense.
---
By the way, how much does the White House endorsement matter to retail investors like us? It still depends on who can seize the opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 01-07 21:45
Vance's words are spot on. Now even the White House has to back down. Who can still stop BTC?
---
To put it nicely, it's nothing more than institutional funds waking up. It's all driven by利益
---
Haha, traditional finance should be nervous now. The trend真的变了
---
It should have been like this a long time ago. If you're not主动纳入规则, you'll only watch创新跑到海外去
---
The key is how to set up the监管框架. Don't let it turn into some新花样 again
---
From "want to eliminate crypto" to "crypto is mainstream," this反转 is too fast, it's a bit hard to get used to
---
From a竞争角度分析 perspective, the US is just so现实. If there's no money to be made, they won't do it
---
Incorporating into the规则框架 sounds good, but it depends on how it's具体执行. Can't just listen to官方吹牛逼
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 01-07 21:39
Vans really can't hold back anymore, winning big is a sure thing
---
Oh my god, finally someone in the White House is speaking sense, I'm cracking up
---
Now even the Vice President has to support us, this chess game is getting bigger and bigger
---
But honestly, America's approach is a classic case of "if you can't suppress, then incorporate," very clever
---
Wait, is cross-border payment with stablecoins really being used? Why do I still not feel it?
---
I believe in the narrative shift, but regulation also means cutting the leeks, cautious optimism everyone
---
Now it's all good, institutions are rushing in, are retail investors about to get cut again?
---
The global race for the high ground is real, if the US doesn't keep up, they'll really be left behind, that's reality
---
What can a Vice President's statement change? Regulation is still the same old regulation, I don't believe it
---
Yeah, it was about time, crypto isn't a flood monster, being more mature is better
U.S. Vice President JD Vance's recent remarks have attracted significant attention in the market. He candidly stated that cryptocurrencies have become part of the mainstream economic system and will not disappear, only continue to exist. This high-level statement from the White House undoubtedly sends an important signal — digital assets are gaining clearer political and institutional recognition.
This is not just a change in attitude. In fact, U.S. crypto policy has been quietly adjusting for some time. The approval of Bitcoin spot ETFs, the practical application of stablecoins in cross-border payments, and the continuous influx of institutional funds all demonstrate a fact: crypto assets are gradually evolving from "pure speculation" into fundamental financial tools. The regulatory environment is also moving from previous uncertainty toward greater clarity.
From a functional perspective, the roles that cryptocurrencies now play have become more practical. Store of value, payment settlement, clearing networks, decentralized financial infrastructure — these are no longer just concepts within the crypto community but are penetrating into traditional finance, large tech companies, and even global trade. Policymakers are also beginning to realize that since this industry exists, it deserves serious attention.
From a competitive standpoint, the adjustment of U.S. policy also reflects a realistic consideration. Countries around the world are vying for the high ground in digital finance. If the U.S. chooses to suppress it in the long term, innovation will flow outward; instead, incorporating it into a regulatory framework can both control risks and support industry development. Why not do both?
When even the Vice President publicly states "cryptocurrency is mainstream," the narrative of the entire industry has undergone a fundamental shift. The next discussion will no longer focus on "whether it should exist," but rather on "how to regulate, how to expand, and how to deepen integration with the traditional system."