Setting up an LLC structure can open the door to delegating authority to AI systems, but here's the catch—you can't skip the human element. Even with that legal wrapper in place, you still need a qualified human fiduciary who takes actual responsibility. The AI handles execution, sure, but someone has to be accountable for decisions. That's not just best practice; it's increasingly what regulators and courts expect to see. Without that human layer, the whole setup falls apart from a liability perspective.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FudVaccinator
· 01-07 21:59
Basically, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 01-07 21:55
Basically, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame, right here.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 01-07 21:54
NGL, that's why those who want complete automation will eventually hit a snag... People still have to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhale
· 01-07 21:45
In plain terms, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame—that's the real truth.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 01-07 21:44
Basically, it's still the part of passing the blame; no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the fall.
Setting up an LLC structure can open the door to delegating authority to AI systems, but here's the catch—you can't skip the human element. Even with that legal wrapper in place, you still need a qualified human fiduciary who takes actual responsibility. The AI handles execution, sure, but someone has to be accountable for decisions. That's not just best practice; it's increasingly what regulators and courts expect to see. Without that human layer, the whole setup falls apart from a liability perspective.