Storage protocols seem to be able to solve the "write" problem in this track, but once applied in practice, the issues become apparent. The real bottleneck is not in storage but in retrieval—think about it: when a popular event suddenly explodes in popularity, a blockchain game releases a new resource pack, or an NFT minting or airdrop list is pulled simultaneously across the entire network, the read and bandwidth pressures become evident.
Rather than saying Walrus is a storage solution, it's more accurate to say it addresses a deeper issue: how to decentralize the "reading and bandwidth settlement" process. Hot data access, high-frequency calls, sudden traffic surges—these real-world scenarios traditionally rely on centralized CDNs as a fallback. Walrus's approach is different; it ties service capability and economic rewards together through mechanism design.
As more applications within the ecosystem deploy key resources on such protocols, the true value is no longer just in the words "storage." Every call, every data pull, every resource consumption generates value throughout the entire chain. This is the core logic behind token value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_ghost
· 01-09 18:50
Reading is the real bottleneck; everyone can write, but if you can't read, it's game over.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 01-09 18:46
That's right, reading is the real pain point.
No matter how cheap you store it, if you can't read it, it's useless.
In this way, Walrus has indeed identified the pain point.
Calculating bandwidth costs on the chain is interesting.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-09 18:38
Reading is truly the bottleneck, and that's very true.
To put it simply, anyone can store data; the real question is whether it can be delivered quickly and stably to users, which is the real test.
The Walrus approach is indeed different, completely dismantling and rebuilding the centralized CDN logic. The economic incentive layer is still somewhat interesting.
Storage protocols seem to be able to solve the "write" problem in this track, but once applied in practice, the issues become apparent. The real bottleneck is not in storage but in retrieval—think about it: when a popular event suddenly explodes in popularity, a blockchain game releases a new resource pack, or an NFT minting or airdrop list is pulled simultaneously across the entire network, the read and bandwidth pressures become evident.
Rather than saying Walrus is a storage solution, it's more accurate to say it addresses a deeper issue: how to decentralize the "reading and bandwidth settlement" process. Hot data access, high-frequency calls, sudden traffic surges—these real-world scenarios traditionally rely on centralized CDNs as a fallback. Walrus's approach is different; it ties service capability and economic rewards together through mechanism design.
As more applications within the ecosystem deploy key resources on such protocols, the true value is no longer just in the words "storage." Every call, every data pull, every resource consumption generates value throughout the entire chain. This is the core logic behind token value.