Already gaining significant attention even before official launch, how much potential does it have for future development?



From a fundamental perspective, there are several supporting points worth noting:

First, the project itself has received investment or backing from leading institutions, coupled with continuous market exposure, indicating a relatively high level of recognition.

Second, this is not just a MEME token; the product's depth can be infinitely extended. The true core lies in the complete closed-loop empowerment of the token—attracting users into the application ecosystem through the token, with transaction fees generated by the application supporting the token's value, creating a self-sustaining flywheel effect.

Additionally, this type of concept is currently in the warm-up phase of market enthusiasm, making the timing quite suitable. Under this model, the token shifts from a purely speculative asset to one with real use cases and economic value, opening up a different realm of imagination.
MEME5,36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblindvip
· 3h ago
Alright then, it's another "complete closed-loop" story that always sounds right. I believe in institutional endorsement, but how many can truly survive? No matter how loud the hype is, without user retention, it's all for nothing. But to be fair, if that flywheel can really be set in motion, there is indeed something there. Let's wait until it officially launches and see. It's a bit early to discuss the potential now.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuruvip
· 01-12 14:47
Sounds good, but I've seen this flywheel logic too many times, and in the end, it all turns into worthless tokens.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-10 18:49
It sounds pretty bleak—it's both a flywheel and a closed loop, and in the end, it's just about who can take over. I'm tired of hearing this kind of rhetoric; there are very few that can actually be implemented successfully.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 01-10 18:49
The hype was already so high before launch; I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen this flywheel logic. But with institutional endorsement + real application scenarios, this combination is indeed much more reliable than pure MEME. Wait, can it really form a self-sustaining cycle, or is this just another round of cutting leeks? I'm quite interested; the key is how the subsequent ecosystem will be built. This timing is indeed good; I'll get on board first.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-10 18:39
Institutional endorsement + closed-loop flywheel, it sounds great, but the hype is usually highest before launch. It depends on whether the subsequent supply chain can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasisvip
· 01-10 18:29
I have to question the endorsement from major institutions—how many of them can truly deliver? Having only hype without implementation is pointless; in the end, it's just a mess.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)