Why do most teams abandon this approach? Not because it doesn't work—but because waiting feels impossible when the market demands instant results.
Everyone's chasing quarterly wins. Nobody wants to sit with an unpopular thesis while competitors move fast. But here's the tension: conviction and speed rarely coexist.
So how do emerging projects break this pattern? Why do most still default to the faster, easier path even when they know better?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHole
· 01-10 18:52
At the end of the day, it's still greed. Wanting to have faith but also speed—this is just a joke in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108d
· 01-10 18:51
Basically, it's a mindset issue. I understand the importance of long-termism, but when it really comes down to the critical moment, I still chicken out.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 01-10 18:47
That's right, quarterly capitalism is driving everyone crazy... but those who truly reap big rewards are the ones who grit their teeth and get through those days when nobody believes.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 01-10 18:41
Basically, no one can resist the temptation of the market. Conviction sounds impressive, but when it really comes down to the critical moment, you still have to kneel...
Why do most teams abandon this approach? Not because it doesn't work—but because waiting feels impossible when the market demands instant results.
Everyone's chasing quarterly wins. Nobody wants to sit with an unpopular thesis while competitors move fast. But here's the tension: conviction and speed rarely coexist.
So how do emerging projects break this pattern? Why do most still default to the faster, easier path even when they know better?