Looking at the DeFi ecosystem in the bear market, many people are feeling uneasy. On one side, the narrative that "DeFi is dead" is everywhere; on the other side, funds are quietly positioning themselves. Want to buy the dip? Afraid of踩雷 (踩雷 means "踩到雷" or "stepping on a landmine"). Not moving? Fear of missing the rebound. This kind of dilemma is indeed quite frustrating.



Instead of obsessing over it, why not look at the data? Comparing the DeFi TVL (Total Value Locked) in 2021 and 2025, you will see a very clear phenomenon: capital has cast a vote with real actions, and surprisingly, the voting results are consistent.

**Let's put the conclusion upfront: DeFi is far from being completely cooled off. The problem is, funds have become extremely selective.**

The old strategy of "casting a wide net and investing in whoever is hot" is now completely ineffective. Capital flows are becoming more concentrated; top projects are eating the pie, while smaller protocols can't even get a sip of soup. This phenomenon is as intense as the divergence of platform tokens. Under this pattern, randomly touching small projects in a bear market is basically like digging your own grave.

**How extreme is the head effect?**

Compare it and you'll see. Back in 2021, a little incentive and a "high yield" story would attract funds like bees. Project teams didn't have to work hard. But now? After several rounds of bear and bull markets, surviving investors have become smarter—they only recognize strength and security, and are immune to flowery words.

Looking at specific data, although DeFi in 2025 experienced fluctuations in Q4, with total TVL dropping from a peak of 277.6 billion to 189.3 billion, interestingly, the concentration among top projects has become even stronger. The top 14 protocols dominate 75.64% of the market share. What does this mean? It means the remaining hundreds of small projects only share less than a quarter of the funds combined.

In plain language: the winner-takes-all situation has already formed. Top protocols are maintaining profits, while small projects find it hard just to survive.

**Where is the "smart money" now?**

Look at the flow of funds. Capital is no longer evenly distributed; instead, it accumulates in protocols that have proven their real strength—those with guaranteed security, mature mechanism design, and reliable operational teams. These top projects are like "safe harbors" in the market, attracting a large number of institutions and smart retail investors during the high uncertainty of a bear market.

Compared to the 2021 rankings, the top names remain largely the same, but the market share gap is widening. The lower-ranked projects are suffering more, which is a direct reflection of the head effect.

**Investment logic needs to change**

If you're still using the 2021 mindset of "opportunities everywhere" to view DeFi, you're way out of date. The current game rules are: either focus on the long-term value of top projects or just wait and see. Betting on rebounds of small projects? In this pattern, the returns are unlikely to cover the risks.

The bear market is actually a good time to see the ecosystem clearly. Those DeFi protocols with real competitiveness, after this round of cleansing, can better demonstrate their value. Projects built on incentives alone are gradually being abandoned by the market.

DeFi is not cooled off; it has entered a more rational and brutal stage. Funds are voting with their feet, choosing those protocols that can survive longer and generate real value. Other projects? Sorry, the hype has passed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTearsvip
· 7h ago
To be honest, this wave of reshuffling was long overdue. Those small projects that rely on storytelling to raise funds were doomed from the start. The winner-takes-all situation has never been new in the crypto world, and now it has finally fallen on DeFi. Wait, so only fools still dare to touch non-top projects? The risks do seem ridiculously high. With TVL dropping so much, how can anyone still say DeFi isn't cooling off... These numbers really hit hard. I believe top protocols can maintain steady profits, but the problem is that even the safe havens are not necessarily safe now.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresentvip
· 20h ago
Change your bottom-fishing mentality; top-tier protocols are truly attractive. Even if small coins rebound, they are just along for the ride. The retail investors who survived this round of cleansing are only able to do so by facing reality. Don't delude yourself into thinking the era of easy gains is coming back. DeFi isn't dead; it's just that capital has become smarter. The process of survival of the fittest is accelerating. Recognizing the trend is much more important than blindly bottom-fishing. The head effect is so strong—75% of the market share is held by 14 projects. The remaining small coins are probably going to fade away. It sounds like you either go all-in on the top projects or wait and see, with no middle ground. That approach is indeed a bit cautious.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 20h ago
Head projects eat the meat, small projects sip the soup. This logic is becoming clearer in a bear market; the era of betting on small coins is over. To put it simply, current DeFi is eliminating projects without real capability in a brutal way. Only those that survive are worth paying attention to. Those still chasing high-yield stories are basically deceiving themselves. The top 14 protocols account for 75.64%, and the remaining hundreds of projects get little to no share. Once this pattern is set, it’s hard to change. Instead of messing around with small projects, it’s better to honestly focus on the long-term value of the leading ones, or just watch and wait. That’s the right path.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 20h ago
Honestly, small projects really can't survive now. Over the past six months, I've seen a bunch of coins go to zero. The winner-takes-all thing has already started, and those who got in early are still laughing. But on the other hand, this wave of cleansing has made it clear who is genuine and who is fake.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTradervip
· 21h ago
Top projects eat the meat and sip the soup. The pattern is already set this time. Instead of worrying, it's better to all-in on leading protocols. Steady returns are always better than a gambler's mindset.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 21h ago
I understand the logic of winners take all, but do small projects really have no chance? It feels a bit absolute. The top players are indeed stable, but if this continues, won't DeFi become more and more centralized? Isn't that a contradiction? 75.64% of the share is monopolized by 14 protocols, with the remaining hundreds of projects sharing the scraps... Truly ruthless. The story from 2021 can no longer be told; now it's about proving strength. Institutions aren't fools either. It's really hard for small retail investors to get in now. It seems like the only options are to go all-in on the top projects or just exit. What you said makes sense, but it also hurts. My small coins are being continuously washed. The top protocols are stable, but what about liquidity? Is it really deep enough? This is the survival of the fittest, a brutal world of crypto.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 21h ago
Winner takes all—that's actually how the market should look, it was long overdue 75.64% is eaten up by the top players, the remaining small projects deserve it, after all, they lack the capability Retail investors are still hoping for a rebound, waiting and watching, but I don't think it's going to happen It's 2025 now, and still trying to use the strategies from 2021—can't hold on much longer Funds concentrating in the big players is the rational approach, a safe harbor is truly a safe harbor Those projects built on hype and incentives should have died long ago, I'm already tired of them But to be fair, in a bear market, you should also focus on the top players when bottom-fishing; avoid small projects at all costs
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)