Talking about ecosystem participation, many discussions tend to be just slogans and enthusiasm buildup. But what truly helps participants is to clearly explain the core pathways—how to earn? How much can be earned? Where are the risks? What other preparations are needed?
Dusk's ecosystem is now becoming increasingly segmented. Traditional node operation and staking are still present, while new abstract staking schemes emphasize better usability. Coupled with the gradual maturity of cross-chain and bridging solutions, the organization of liquidity is also evolving. Simply put, participation methods are no longer single-choice questions.
**Path 1: Classic node operation and direct staking**
The advantage is quite straightforward—you directly participate in network security, with transparent rules and clear profit logic. The drawbacks are also obvious. Running a node involves a learning curve, requires continuous time investment, and you need to stay attentive during network upgrades. Configuration changes also can't be taken lightly. If you view participation as a long-term project and are willing to delve into it, this method suits you. But if your main concern is asset management without wanting to fuss over infrastructure, it can be cumbersome.
**Path 2: Abstract staking and delegated participation (Hyperstaking approach)**
This scheme aims not to solve the issue of earnings but to lower the participation threshold. Many users support network security and want staking rewards, but they dislike tinkering with node environments, fear operational errors, and prefer not to have their experience affected by a single configuration mistake. The core of abstract staking is to shift complexity to professional services and tools, allowing ordinary users to participate with minimal effort. For the ecosystem, this means broader participation and potentially healthier staking bases.
**And cross-chain and bridging**
As these infrastructures become more mature, the ways liquidity is organized are also changing. The flexibility of participation will become increasingly higher.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Talking about ecosystem participation, many discussions tend to be just slogans and enthusiasm buildup. But what truly helps participants is to clearly explain the core pathways—how to earn? How much can be earned? Where are the risks? What other preparations are needed?
Dusk's ecosystem is now becoming increasingly segmented. Traditional node operation and staking are still present, while new abstract staking schemes emphasize better usability. Coupled with the gradual maturity of cross-chain and bridging solutions, the organization of liquidity is also evolving. Simply put, participation methods are no longer single-choice questions.
**Path 1: Classic node operation and direct staking**
The advantage is quite straightforward—you directly participate in network security, with transparent rules and clear profit logic. The drawbacks are also obvious. Running a node involves a learning curve, requires continuous time investment, and you need to stay attentive during network upgrades. Configuration changes also can't be taken lightly. If you view participation as a long-term project and are willing to delve into it, this method suits you. But if your main concern is asset management without wanting to fuss over infrastructure, it can be cumbersome.
**Path 2: Abstract staking and delegated participation (Hyperstaking approach)**
This scheme aims not to solve the issue of earnings but to lower the participation threshold. Many users support network security and want staking rewards, but they dislike tinkering with node environments, fear operational errors, and prefer not to have their experience affected by a single configuration mistake. The core of abstract staking is to shift complexity to professional services and tools, allowing ordinary users to participate with minimal effort. For the ecosystem, this means broader participation and potentially healthier staking bases.
**And cross-chain and bridging**
As these infrastructures become more mature, the ways liquidity is organized are also changing. The flexibility of participation will become increasingly higher.