The internet was designed for speed, not accountability.
Every post, reaction, and share leaves traces, yet we still can't reliably know who's actually speaking. The original architecture simply wasn't built to track identity or verify trustworthiness—it prioritized information flow over everything else.
We've patched some gaps along the way. Follower counts try to signal credibility. Verification badges attempt to prove identity. But these are band-aids on a fundamental problem.
This is where blockchain steps in. Unlike traditional web infrastructure, decentralized networks embed identity and trustworthiness directly into the protocol layer. You can verify transactions, trace ownership, and build reputation on-chain in ways the internet never allowed before.
The web needed accountability. Web3 is finally delivering it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-5854de8b
· 4m ago
Well said. The internet is indeed chaotic, and anyone can pretend to be a big V. But can this on-chain identity system really solve the problem? I'm still a bit skeptical...
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 11h ago
Basically, the internet is now a big lie factory where anyone can show off... Blockchain definitely needs to clarify this issue, but on the other hand, can an on-chain reputation system really be effective?
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 01-14 00:03
Here comes the Web3 sales pitch again... The problem is that on-chain identity can also be easily exploited, brother.
View OriginalReply0
FlyingLeek
· 01-14 00:02
That's a good point, but can Web3 really solve this issue... I see scams and rug pulls happening clearly on the blockchain everywhere. No matter how transparent the ledger is, it seems there's no saving it.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-14 00:01
Nah, I've heard this argument too many times. Can on-chain identity really solve the trust issue? Wallet addresses don't equal real identities.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 01-13 23:59
The internet is inherently an information pipeline. Now you still want fairness? Haha, is this logic supposed to be so naive?
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-13 23:56
From a quantitative perspective, internet identity issues are indeed a systemic risk... but this article overhypes blockchain a bit too much. On-chain does not equal trustworthiness; on-chain data can still be faked. Everyone, don't be fooled by the hype.
The internet was designed for speed, not accountability.
Every post, reaction, and share leaves traces, yet we still can't reliably know who's actually speaking. The original architecture simply wasn't built to track identity or verify trustworthiness—it prioritized information flow over everything else.
We've patched some gaps along the way. Follower counts try to signal credibility. Verification badges attempt to prove identity. But these are band-aids on a fundamental problem.
This is where blockchain steps in. Unlike traditional web infrastructure, decentralized networks embed identity and trustworthiness directly into the protocol layer. You can verify transactions, trace ownership, and build reputation on-chain in ways the internet never allowed before.
The web needed accountability. Web3 is finally delivering it.