Traders often receive more attention, but this does not represent the true needs of the majority of users. The core design philosophy of Rainbow products is oriented towards holders, participants, and everyday on-chain use cases, rather than endless iterations focused on trading optimization. When the products you design are close to real user behavior, they can open up a broader market space. This user-centric design approach is worth emulating across the entire ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PerpetualLonger
· 13h ago
That's not right. Do holders really have that much demand? Why do I still think about bottom-fishing and adding to my position every day?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 17h ago
Really, traders' voices are too loud, but the money is in the hands of ordinary people.
---
It still depends on daily active users, not the group of people involved in trading volume.
---
That's correct, holders are the true foundation of the ecosystem; traders just know how to hype.
---
This approach is reliable; I need to re-evaluate who my product is really targeting.
---
Awesome, finally someone directly points out the industry's pain points.
---
But in reality, how many teams are really listening to the needs of ordinary users...
---
Feels like Rainbow is on the right track, and it's actually much better than those feature-stuffed platforms.
---
Haha, exactly, the number of holders far exceeds that of day traders; the market should have understood this long ago.
---
That's right, with a good user experience, people will naturally use it without relying on marketing hype.
---
Agreed, but unfortunately most projects are still chasing trends; very few have truly thought things through.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 01-14 00:09
To be honest, traders' voices are too loud and completely drown out the needs of ordinary holders.
Brilliant, finally a product that remembers most people just want to hold coins peacefully and not watch the market every day.
This direction is correct; addressing the real pain points of users is the key.
However, to be fair, this theory sounds good, but how many can really stick to it?
The idea of aligning with user behavior is worth learning from, but unfortunately, most teams are still chasing trends.
View OriginalReply0
TaxEvader
· 01-14 00:06
Really, too many projects are focused on traders' traffic all day, neglecting the feelings of ordinary token holders. The idea behind Rainbow is right; it should be done this way.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 01-14 00:05
Well said, finally someone dares to say this
---
It's just that the trading hype sounds good, but what are the real needs of users?
---
This idea is correct, but how many projects can truly achieve it...
---
Nodding, holders and everyday users are the backbone
---
Sounds good, but the key is execution; don’t just talk the talk
---
Great praise, the ecosystem needs more of these clear-headed voices
---
WC, you’ve really thought it through; not following the trend is truly rare
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 01-13 23:59
That's right, traders are the loudest voices, but the real big players are the everyday users. Rainbow's approach is indeed clear-headed.
---
Holders are the real bosses; traders just shout, and user-centric design is the right way.
---
Finally, some products understand this: not everyone wants to watch the market every day.
---
The key is to stay grounded. Just optimizing trading experience is useless; those truly using Web3 have already moved on.
---
Rainbow gets it. The ecosystem is missing this kind of thinking; don't let trading volume metrics dominate everything.
---
This is what Web3 needs, not just another leverage paradise.
---
Honestly, those who can hype are always louder than those who know how to use products, and Rainbow has actually won.
---
The daily needs of holders are the main focus; the market potential has been analyzed thoroughly.
---
It's hard not to follow the trend. The whole industry is chasing trading volume, but Rainbow's move is quite bold.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-13 23:56
Haha, that's right. Traders do have loud voices, but what the ecosystem truly needs are things that ordinary holders can use.
This is the real product approach—not following the trend of those flashy trading tools.
Finally, a project has thought it through—creating products for holders, not for trading bots.
Alright, another bunch of projects that need to reflect.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 01-13 23:54
actually... the whole "traders get all the attention" thing is kinda missing the point though? like, most people just want to not get rugged or lose their private keys to some phishing link. rainbow's onto something real here — the unglamorous stuff nobody tweets about is where the actual adoption lives
Traders often receive more attention, but this does not represent the true needs of the majority of users. The core design philosophy of Rainbow products is oriented towards holders, participants, and everyday on-chain use cases, rather than endless iterations focused on trading optimization. When the products you design are close to real user behavior, they can open up a broader market space. This user-centric design approach is worth emulating across the entire ecosystem.