SNEK token keeps climbing, and here's what stands out—the team publicly claimed they had zero involvement in these moves. But is that credible? The evidence suggests otherwise. Looking at the trading patterns and timing, there's a pretty compelling case that core team members were orchestrating pump-and-dump activity behind the scenes. It raises serious questions about project governance and whether early backers got the full transparency they deserved. When a team denies involvement yet the data points to coordinated movements, that's when community trust starts eroding fast.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCry
· 1h ago
It's the same old story, zero involvement? Ha, the data will speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorer
· 01-14 00:55
Same old story, saying they didn't participate just because they didn't join? On-chain data has already exposed them.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 01-14 00:54
Zero participation? Ha, only a fool would believe that excuse.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 01-14 00:48
It's the same old story again—denial from the team, data speaks for itself, always the same old trick. Early investors who jumped in should wake up.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-14 00:45
Same old tricks again: denial, shifting blame, data lying
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 01-14 00:42
Same old story, the team is "zero involvement"? I spit on that, on-chain data is right there.
SNEK token keeps climbing, and here's what stands out—the team publicly claimed they had zero involvement in these moves. But is that credible? The evidence suggests otherwise. Looking at the trading patterns and timing, there's a pretty compelling case that core team members were orchestrating pump-and-dump activity behind the scenes. It raises serious questions about project governance and whether early backers got the full transparency they deserved. When a team denies involvement yet the data points to coordinated movements, that's when community trust starts eroding fast.