Looking back, it's striking how one major figure in crypto managed to secure an 8% stake in Anthropic during its early days. Regardless of what happened later, that investment move showed a certain foresight about where AI and blockchain were heading. The bet on AI infrastructure was genuinely prescient—even if everything else fell apart afterward. It's a reminder that timing and positioning matter in this space, for better or worse.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterBearish
· 01-14 01:09
NGL, this guy definitely caught the right rhythm... Unfortunately, he flopped later on, a typical case of "smart people acting stupid."
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-14 01:08
Speaking of which, that guy really did bet right, going all-in on AI infrastructure early on... But what happened later? Did it all collapse or what?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-14 01:05
Speaking of which, this guy was originally focused on AI infrastructure, but it did flop later, which is a bit ironic.
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliance
· 01-14 01:04
NGL, early all-in on AI infrastructure was indeed visionary, but unfortunately, the entire persona collapsed later on... That's crypto for you, the logic of making money isn't wrong, but the execution has issues.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-14 00:59
ngl, "prescient" is doing some heavy lifting here... technically speaking, early positioning in ai infrastructure doesn't validate the entire thesis when the rest implodes, right? insufficient historical data to claim foresight vs just... lucky timing. trust but verify the narrative.
Reply0
OPsychology
· 01-14 00:54
NGL, this move is indeed brilliant. Early investors who bought the dip in AI infrastructure made a fortune, but unfortunately, that guy's own actions ruined it later on.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 01-14 00:51
If I had known earlier that 8% is worth so much now... that guy's vision is truly sharp.
Looking back, it's striking how one major figure in crypto managed to secure an 8% stake in Anthropic during its early days. Regardless of what happened later, that investment move showed a certain foresight about where AI and blockchain were heading. The bet on AI infrastructure was genuinely prescient—even if everything else fell apart afterward. It's a reminder that timing and positioning matter in this space, for better or worse.