2026-01-14 01:32:51

Seriously, why don't devs just lock their tokens? That should be baseline. It's literally the bare minimum you'd expect from any project that wants to build credibility. When team members aren't committed to holding through the long game, it sends the wrong signal to the entire community. Token locks aren't just a nice-to-have—they're foundational to showing you actually believe in what you're building.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquiditySurfer

· 5h ago

Haha, token lock is basically a credibility endorsement. Without this, I wouldn't even consider investing. --- Looking at the project team's token holding commitments is like assessing the market maker's capital efficiency. Teams without locks are as unreliable as trading pairs without liquidity depth. --- Exactly, this is the most basic signal verification. I will directly pass on any devs who can't do this. --- It's already 2024, and there are still projects daring not to lock tokens? That's a clear red flag, everyone. --- Token lock is actually a very simple Martini indicator — whether the team is willing to be on the same boat with you.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 01-15 20:08

It should have been like this earlier. Projects that don't lock tokens are directly blacklisted.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator