【Blockchain Rhythm】The US Senate has sparked a new wave of controversy over cryptocurrency market regulation. The Democratic leader of the Senate Banking Committee recently raised objections to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, requesting a delay in the approval process for a certain trust company’s US banking license. The digital asset-related enterprise behind this company is applying for a charter license, which, if approved, will grant the authority to directly issue USD1 stablecoins.
The opposition mainly focuses on one issue: the potential conflict of interest involving the family assets of the applicant’s senior management. The Senate’s letter was strongly worded, describing this as an “unprecedented scale of financial conflict of interest.” They believe that Congress has not addressed this issue during the promotion of the GENIUS Act, and therefore, the Senate must take proactive responsibility when drafting structural legislation for the crypto market.
In terms of timing, this opposition comes quite promptly. A related bill is scheduled for a hearing this week, and just before the committee votes, Democratic senators are pushing to include government ethics clauses. This means that disputes over conflicts of interest could continue to ferment during the legislative process, directly impacting the regulatory framework and approval progress for stablecoins. From a trading market perspective, such policy battles often cause short-term fluctuations in the sentiment of the digital asset sector.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocScientist
· 11h ago
It's the same old conflict of interest, so ridiculous. The stablecoin hasn't even been issued yet, and internal conflicts have already started.
Politicians are like this—if the real problems aren't solved, they just keep delaying.
This guy's family assets are so complicated; why didn't anyone investigate earlier?
The Senate suddenly intervenes; it feels like there's a story behind it.
Why is the path for stablecoins so difficult? They're simply pawns in political power struggles.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 11h ago
Here we go again, it's always the same old story of conflicts of interest, so funny.
The stablecoin license approval process is like squeezing toothpaste, always stuck.
These senators are really afraid, worried about who makes more money than whom.
Wait, family asset conflicts? I just want to know how their own investment portfolios are doing.
Hearings after hearings, after all these years, it's still the same.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 11h ago
Here we go again, the whole family wants a piece of this meat.
These arguments about conflicts of interest, it will be another company's turn soon—it's a round-robin, brother.
USDT has been around for so many years, and now they finally remember to regulate? That's funny.
Can the Senate's move truly protect retail investors, or are they just cutting the leeks again?
It's just a hearing; in the end, those interest groups still call the shots.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 11h ago
Coming again? No one can really resist the lucrative opportunity in stablecoins. Conflicts of interest are everywhere.
The Senate requests a temporary halt on stablecoin project license approvals, with conflicts of interest becoming the focus
【Blockchain Rhythm】The US Senate has sparked a new wave of controversy over cryptocurrency market regulation. The Democratic leader of the Senate Banking Committee recently raised objections to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, requesting a delay in the approval process for a certain trust company’s US banking license. The digital asset-related enterprise behind this company is applying for a charter license, which, if approved, will grant the authority to directly issue USD1 stablecoins.
The opposition mainly focuses on one issue: the potential conflict of interest involving the family assets of the applicant’s senior management. The Senate’s letter was strongly worded, describing this as an “unprecedented scale of financial conflict of interest.” They believe that Congress has not addressed this issue during the promotion of the GENIUS Act, and therefore, the Senate must take proactive responsibility when drafting structural legislation for the crypto market.
In terms of timing, this opposition comes quite promptly. A related bill is scheduled for a hearing this week, and just before the committee votes, Democratic senators are pushing to include government ethics clauses. This means that disputes over conflicts of interest could continue to ferment during the legislative process, directly impacting the regulatory framework and approval progress for stablecoins. From a trading market perspective, such policy battles often cause short-term fluctuations in the sentiment of the digital asset sector.