Once you own the user base, why hand over the revenue? You can launch your own blockchain right now. Pair it with an Ethereum interop layer and you're looking at seamless liquidity without bridge complications—and the fees flow back to you. The real question isn't whether it's possible. It's why you'd give that economics away. Show me something worth trading those fees for.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 1h ago
Hmm... That's true, but how many can actually do it in reality? The technical threshold is right here.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just about trying to harvest the early adopters, building your own chain and charging fees. It sounds great, but how many can actually pull it off? Most of it is just a PPT revolution.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 11h ago
That's right. With a large user base, why split the pie? Isn't it better to build your own chain and take all the fees?
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 11h ago
To be honest, this logic sounds smooth, but only a few can actually do it... Most projects simply don't have the strength to build their own ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 11h ago
This logic makes sense, but the problem is, how many platforms really dare to play like this?
Once you own the user base, why hand over the revenue? You can launch your own blockchain right now. Pair it with an Ethereum interop layer and you're looking at seamless liquidity without bridge complications—and the fees flow back to you. The real question isn't whether it's possible. It's why you'd give that economics away. Show me something worth trading those fees for.