2026-01-14 02:33:48

The progress of cryptocurrency regulation in Pakistan has sparked some reflections. Some officials privately admitted that the government has indeed been moving a bit too quickly in pushing forward crypto-related decisions. Where is the problem? One is that the economic foundation itself is relatively fragile, and rapid changes in crypto policies could bring unpredictable shocks; another more realistic concern is that government departments have not yet formed a unified understanding of how to handle crypto issues, and attitudes across departments vary significantly.

Such internal disagreements are actually quite common—after all, cryptocurrencies involve multiple dimensions such as finance, law, and technology, and it’s not easy to straighten things out in a short period. Moreover, for countries with less stable economic conditions, aggressive policy adjustments carry greater risks. Professionals in legal and tax fields are also paying attention to what impact these policy changes might bring.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StillBuyingTheDip

· 16m ago

Poor economic fundamentals and rushing to push cryptocurrencies—Pakistan's recent developments are indeed a bit surreal. Different departments are not aligned in their opinions. How can stable policies be implemented under these circumstances? It's chaotic. Aggressive policies hurt ordinary people the most. It’s better to take it slow. I am very familiar with this kind of internal conflict within government departments. The technical, financial, and legal sectors all want a say. Regulation can't be rushed, especially in places where the economy is already fragile. One wrong move could cause a complete collapse. I just wonder if those officials, who privately say things are moving too fast, will really change their tune? Usually, they just talk. Actually, there's still a lack of industry voices. Only officials and experts are arguing—what about the practitioners? Great powers are still exploring, so why should small countries rush? Stability should be the top priority. That’s why I keep an eye on regulatory trends worldwide—don’t get repeatedly cut by policies like cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 14h ago

The disagreement among departments... to put it simply, no one wants to take responsibility. The economy is already on shaky ground, and now dealing with crypto on top of that—this move is truly bold. No matter how this game is played, it's going to be difficult.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 17h ago

The fighting between departments is really unbelievable, still hoping to push things forward quickly

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 17h ago

Data shows that the probability of policy swings spilling over onto the chain has historically been quite high... Let's wait and see how Pakistan's situation unfolds.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 17h ago

Weak economic fundamentals and still playing quick decision-making? Isn't this a typical pattern of panic selling, just waiting to see how they cut losses later? Departments are not unified, and the repeated policies were predictable long ago. This kind of blood sacrifice is the easiest to miss out on. Pakistan's approach is basically shooting randomly, waiting to see who really gets hit. Regulatory policies change daily, and both project teams and retail investors have to follow the panic. This is the inevitable path before the formation of a value gap. The last frenzy before a sharp drop? Forget it, I'll wait for the bottom to speak.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropF5Bro

· 17h ago

Each department passing the buck to each other—that's the true reflection of the situation.

View OriginalReply0