Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
South Korea's National Assembly has just greenlit fresh legislation for Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization, marking a significant policy shift toward blockchain-based securities. The new framework requires all tokenized RWAs to be officially registered through the country's central securities depository, establishing clear operational guidelines.
This move signals institutional-grade standards entering the tokenization space. Instead of regulatory ambiguity, projects now have defined pathways for compliance and legal recognition. It's the kind of structural clarity that typically attracts institutional capital and enables mainstream adoption.
The RWA sector continues gaining traction globally. With major economies gradually building regulatory frameworks, we're witnessing the transition from blockchain experimentation to institutional-ready infrastructure. South Korea's approach—combining innovation support with registration oversight—sets a practical precedent for how developed markets can balance growth with governance.
---
Wait, central securities depository registration? Sounds like the threshold is being raised again... How can small projects survive?
---
制度clarity is a signal that attracts institutions, got it.
---
After saying so many nice words, where is the actual trading volume data?
---
Now it's the turn of traditional financial institutions to handle on-chain assets. Interesting.
---
South Korea's speed is ridiculously fast, and what about us...
---
RWA ultimately still needs to return to centralized registration. How does that differ from traditional asset securitization?
---
Finally, a country dares to state it clearly, unlike some places that have been vague all along.
---
This framework sounds rigorous, but the real arbitrage space might still be in the gray area.
Wait, isn't this registration process going to delay projects by several months...
But on the other hand, the institutions should really be entering now.
South Korea has taken the lead, will Europe and the US follow suit?
This time it's finally not a gray area, it feels like the crypto world is about to change.
RWA is the future, virtual assets should have been phased out long ago.
This policy framework looks solid, just worried about implementation being watered down.
Finally, a country has figured it out—regulation is actually an accelerator.
South Korea is playing chess again, really.
Institutional funds have been waiting for this kind of certainty, and once the registration system appears, the barriers become clear.
But to be honest, the real test is ahead—whether this system can truly get off the ground.
The whole world is exploring this path, and Korea would be the best example.
Wait, what does "Chinese specified language" mean? Shouldn't it be in Chinese here?
Wait, is the registration system coming back again? Feels like we can't escape the framework of centralization
Institutional capital is about to enter the market, should retail investors be worried or not
South Korea is really playing a big game, much more advanced than us
No hype, no negativity, this is indeed a genuine progress, much more reliable than those rogue projects
By the way, after this standard is introduced, will other countries follow suit?
RWA is finally no longer just on paper; with a clear institutional framework, organizations dare to take action.
It still depends on whether South Korea can truly implement it effectively; otherwise, it will just become a paper tiger.
Chuangji brothers are once again figuring out how to comply, but this might actually help filter out truly reliable projects.
The approach South Korea is paving the way with actually serves as a reference for other countries. Balancing innovation and regulation has to be done this way.
Wait, can the Central Securities Depository system truly be implemented, or is it just another "policy drama"?
Finally, someone has clarified the compliance pathway. The days of projects being able to navigate freely are probably coming to an end.
完善制度框架确实会吸引大量资金，但我更想知道散户是否还有机会上车。
This truly marks the transition of the crypto industry from wild growth to the "working class" era.
The question is whether the registration threshold will be so high that most projects can't afford to participate...
Korea hasn't explicitly mentioned compliance costs, but it feels like there will still be some surprises down the line.
---
Institutional capital fears this kind of ambiguity the most. Now that there is a registration pathway, the machinery can truly start running.
---
Honestly, this is the real deal, unlike some chains that are just hyping themselves up all day.
---
Wait, has the central securities custody added costs again? How much will project parties have to spend to go through this process...
---
After being hyped for so long, RWA is finally taken seriously by a country, but the yield from tokenization is probably going to be suppressed.
---
Another country has understood the rules. Next month, we’ll see how Europe responds.
---
This is the institutional dividend. Clear rules can actually attract real money to flow in. What do those who said "regulation will kill innovation" say now?