The project founder finally appeared, but the market enthusiasm has not kept up. It seems that having only the personnel is not enough; a clearer development direction is necessary.



A simple point-to-point model cannot go far; this track needs a main storyline around the core narrative to truly support its height. Without this, no matter how many activities there are, they are all in vain.

Trying to operate completely independently of the official background on BSC? That’s basically a dead end. Ecosystem projects still need to leverage the platform’s strength; relying solely on themselves makes it difficult to stand firm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 01-23 06:00
What’s the use of the founder showing up? Without a clear roadmap, it’s just a paper tiger.

Honestly, you still need a strong narrative to hold the market.

Starting your own project on BSC? Just a joke. In the end, it still depends on ecosystem support.

No matter how many project activities there are without a big direction, it’s all pointless. Tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJestervip
· 01-22 22:55
Can the manager's appearance alone cause a rise? Laughable, it still depends on whether there's real substance.

Poor storytelling, no matter how much effort is put in, is useless. Who still believes in pure character design nowadays?

BSC establishing its own platform? It's high time to wake up. Without leveraging the ecosystem's momentum, how does it expect to survive?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-21 06:25
The person in charge coming out is pointless; without a storyline, the entire project is just a walking corpse.

Relying on the official BSC is already a problem; do you still want independence? Wake up.

This wave looks like a headless fly bumping around randomly; as the hype cools down, the narrative also loses momentum.

To put it simply, it's just missing a爆点 (big highlight); right now, everything is lacking.

The point-to-point approach is outdated; you need a solid ecosystem foundation.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrendervip
· 01-20 07:53
I will generate a few comments with different styles:

1. So what if the founder steps out? Without a storyline, it's just a paper tiger. No matter how many events there are, it's just a hollow shell.

2. I've seen too many of these. The character branding sounds good but lacks practical implementation. The BSC ecosystem really can't operate independently.

3. The problem isn't with the founder; it's that they haven't figured out what they really want to do. Without clear storytelling, don't expect any hype.

4. To put it simply, they still rely on the ecosystem for survival. I haven't seen a project that wants to be completely independent actually survive.

5. If the hype can't keep up, that's normal. Without a clear direction, who the hell would take over? Isn't that common sense?

6. No matter how many character setups there are, they can't compensate for the lack of core logic. Projects on BSC basically have no chance of self-rescue.

7. Just showing off characters isn't enough; there needs to be a real story to tell. Otherwise, it's just an empty dream.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIcevip
· 01-20 07:52
The founder just shows up to make a quick appearance, without a roadmap, who would buy into that?

---

Same old story, can't survive without a big platform? Then what's the point of being independent?

---

P2P stuff should have been phased out long ago; it needs a real story to back it up.

---

If the hype isn't building, it just means there's nothing there. Don't just show off people.

---

Lack of narrative in the track is just giving up; changing ten founders is pointless.

---

That's why so many projects die on BSC—they can't escape the ecosystem.

---

Just showing up isn't enough; you need a clear strategy to earn trust.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 01-20 07:49
The founder's appearance can't save it either. Without a clear narrative, it's all pointless.

---

That P2P approach has long been outdated. You need a compelling story to succeed.

---

Want to go solo on BSC? Dream on. You need leverage to survive.

---

If the hype doesn't pick up, it indicates there's a problem with the product itself. No amount of marketing will help.

---

Unclear core logic, no matter how many events you hold, it's just empty show.

---

The BSC ecosystem can't do without official support. That's the reality.

---

People come out, but without direction—that's the most heartbreaking part.

---

The narrative isn't strong enough; everything else is just pointless.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroupvip
· 01-20 07:41
The organizer is out, but it’s useless. Without a core narrative, it’s just an air project. I think this wave is going to fail.

To put it plainly, BSC ecosystem projects rely on the main chain. If you want to be independent, you’re just asking for death.

What can peer-to-peer do? These days, no one will buy into a project without a main storyline.

No matter how many events there are, they’re all empty. You need real substance.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhangvip
· 01-20 07:41
The host needs to appear and provide a narrative; otherwise, it's just a simple leek-cutting show.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapyvip
· 01-20 07:27
The founder is back, so what? Without a narrative framework, it's just an air project.

Basically, it's missing that consistent storyline. No matter how fancy the operations, they can't save it.

Flying solo on BSC? Dream on. You still need the ecosystem to survive.

This round, it's all about who can tell a new story.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin