The future of ATOM may not lie in direct competition with other public chains. Instead of investing huge resources to build competitiveness in public chains, it might be better to consider licensing the technology to potential strategic buyers or large funds, allowing them to develop this system. After all, a purely competitive environment in crypto may not be beneficial for ATOM's development. The project is now at a critical crossroads—whether to continue competing fiercely within the crypto ecosystem or to shift towards technology licensing and collaboration. From a certain perspective, the logic of crypto competition may conflict with ATOM's long-term vision. This is a strategic turning point worth serious consideration.

ATOM1,87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

TrustMeBro

· 01-21 11:35

Honestly, selling ATOM to big funds? That idea is a bit shaky, feels like giving up.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 01-20 09:04

This logic is a bit like passing the buck to others. If ATOM can't do it themselves, they just sell the technology?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-20 09:03

Hey, to be honest, ATOM just doesn't quite understand what it is. Either focus on being a public chain and do it seriously, or honestly sell technology. Don't keep pretending to be something you're not.

View OriginalReply0

DustCollector

· 01-20 08:56

Is it better to lie flat and sell technology rather than force it? Sounds good, but it feels like finding an excuse for the bear market.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 01-20 08:41

Selling technology? Feels more like giving up; ATOM hasn't given it all yet.

Instead of licensing to others, why not do it yourself? What's there to be afraid of?

This logic... trying to find an escape route for yourself here?

It's called cooperation in nice words, but actually it's a lack of confidence.

The path of technology licensing seems like a last resort choice.

Unfavorable competitive environment? Then how did you get started? Have you ever thought about turning around?

And "strategic buyers"... sounds like someone is about to be acquired, it's pointless.

This isn't a turning point; it's a surrender application, my friend.

If you ask me, persistence is more valuable than cowardice. Don't give up on ATOM.

If you're really going down this road, the coin price will have to be halved again.

Selling land is not as good as selling houses; it makes no sense.

View OriginalReply0