Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Annualized return-driven institutional on-chain: How the five major RWA platforms are dividing traditional finance migration
Institutional investors’ most straightforward concern: how much profit can on-chain assets generate?
The development of the RWA market over the past six months tells us that the appeal of annualized returns is driving large-scale traditional capital into blockchain. The market size has approached $20 billion, and this time it’s not speculation—financial executives are doing the math, attracted by the combination of stable annualized yields and 24/7 liquidity offered by tokenized assets.
Tokenized government bond products offer an annualized return of 4%-6%, coupled with the convenience of tradability at any time. Compared to the traditional T+2 settlement cycle, the calculation is simple. Private credit instruments yield annualized returns of 8%-12%. When a financial manager managing billions of dollars of idle capital sees these numbers, the discussion shifts from “Is blockchain feasible” to “Which platform should I choose.”
Currently, five core platforms are driving this wave of institutional capital migration: Rayls Labs, Ondo Finance, Centrifuge, Canton Network, and Polymesh. They each address different problems, offer different yield structures, ultimately forming a seemingly competitive but actually complementary market landscape.
From $8.5B to $197B: Market Explosion Driven by Annualized Returns
In early 2024, on-chain RWA assets totaled only $6 billion to $8 billion. Now, it’s approaching $20 billion. The rapid growth reflects institutions’ desire for real yields.
According to mid-January 2026 data from rwa.xyz:
Government bonds and money market funds: $8-9 billion, accounting for 45%-50%. These products have stable annualized yields of 4%-6%, attractive for their safety and liquidity.
Private credit: $2-6 billion, accounting for 20%-30%. Although smaller in scale, they offer yields of 8%-12%, growing fastest. This is especially appealing to asset management firms seeking high returns.
Tokenized stocks: Over $400 million. While the absolute number is small, the growth rate is the fastest, driven by platforms like Ondo Finance opening retail markets.
Market segmentation is more noteworthy than total size. Different yield structures correspond to different types of institutional investors. Banks prioritize privacy and compliance; asset managers seek efficiency and returns; Wall Street firms require comprehensive infrastructure. The existence of these five platforms essentially reflects this diversified demand for annualized yields.
Three Catalysts for Sustainable Annualized Returns
Mathematical logic of yield arbitrage
Tokenized assets have made annualized returns the core reason for institutional capital migration. The 4%-6% yields on government bonds seem moderate, but compare to 1%-2% in money markets and 0.5% in traditional bank deposits, the difference is huge. Private credit yields of 8%-12% are even beyond what traditional assets can offer.
The key is that these yields are backed by fundamentals. U.S. government-backed bonds; private loans from real borrowers; tokenized stocks representing real company equity. The sustainability of these yields is supported by solid fundamentals.
For institutions managing hundreds of billions of dollars, shifting some idle capital into tokenized government bonds with 4%-6% yields can generate tens of millions of dollars more annually compared to placing funds in traditional banks or low-yield assets. This is the genuine motivation for institutions to deploy capital on-chain.
Gradual improvement of regulatory frameworks
The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has been enforced in 27 countries, providing a clear legal framework for yield-bearing products. The SEC’s “ProjectCrypto” is pushing forward the regulation of on-chain securities. Most critically, No-Action Letters allow traditional clearing institutions like DTCC to enter the blockchain space, providing institutional-grade guarantees for custody and settlement of high-yield assets.
Mature custody and data infrastructure
Chronicle Labs has handled over $20 billion in total locked value, and Halborn has completed security audits for major RWA platforms. The maturity of these infrastructures ensures that yield products meet custodial standards—institutions no longer worry about asset loss or platform risks.
However, challenges remain. Cross-chain transactions cost up to $1.3-$1.5 billion annually. Due to high bridging costs, the price difference for the same asset across different chains can reach 1%-3%. This directly erodes the realization of yields and is the most urgent issue to solve in the coming year.
Rayls Labs: Combining Bank-Grade Privacy with Yield
Rayls’ positioning is clear: providing infrastructure for banks that require institutional-grade privacy. Developed by Brazilian fintech Parfin, supported by Framework Ventures, ParaFi Capital, and others, Rayls offers a permissioned, EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain.
Its core tech stack, Enygma, combines zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption, enabling verification without revealing transaction details. For banks, this means they can offer yield products (such as cross-border CBDC settlement yields) while maintaining transaction confidentiality.
Already in operational use:
Most importantly, on January 8, 2026, Rayls announced completion of Halborn security audit. This is critical for banks evaluating production deployment—passing the audit means their yield asset deployment is built on a secure infrastructure.
AmFi alliance’s commitment is more concrete: planning to deploy $1 billion in tokenized assets on Rayls by June 2027, with a reward of 5 million RLS tokens. AmFi is Brazil’s largest private credit tokenization platform, and this commitment signals not just yield potential but clear capital flow.
Rayls’ challenge is market validation. Without public TVL or production deployments, whether the $1 billion target by mid-2027 can be achieved will determine its long-term prospects.
Ondo Finance: Democratizing Yield
Ondo’s story is different. Starting as a specialized tool for government bonds, it evolved into a versatile platform covering tokenized stocks, and is now attempting retail expansion.
Latest data (January 2026):
Why can Ondo expand from government bonds (4%-6% yield) to stock tokenization? Because they understand a simple logic: both institutional and retail investors are seeking higher-yield products. Stock tokenization makes this possible.
On January 8, 2026, Ondo launched 98 new tokenized assets across sectors like AI, electric vehicles, thematic investments—an aggressive expansion rather than a gentle growth.
Ondo plans to launch tokenized US stocks and ETFs on Solana in Q1 2026, expanding yield data from traditional government bonds to higher-yield stocks (depending on company performance). The roadmap’s ultimate goal is to list over 1,000 tokenized assets.
Clear multi-chain deployment strategy:
What’s the most interesting signal? Despite falling token prices, TVL reached $1.93 billion. This proves real demand is growing. Institutional appetite for yield assets exceeds token speculation. This growth is driven by institutional demand for government bond yields and DeFi protocols’ desire for idle stablecoin yields.
During the market consolidation in Q4 2025, TVL continued to grow, indicating that institutional demand is genuine, not a bubble.
Ondo has gained an early advantage—establishing custody relationships with brokers-dealers, completing Halborn audits, deploying products on three major blockchains within six months. Its competitor, Backed Finance, has tokenized assets totaling only $162 million, a stark contrast.
Challenges remain. Price volatility outside trading hours is still an issue—although tokens can be transferred anytime, pricing still depends on exchange hours, with arbitrage opportunities at night in the US. KYC requirements under securities law also limit the narrative of “permissionless” access. No matter how high the yields, complex investor verification reduces attractiveness.
Centrifuge: The Yield Engine for Institutional Asset Managers
Centrifuge has become the standard for institutional private credit tokenization. By December 2025, TVL reached $1.3-$1.45 billion. This growth is driven not by speculation but by actual institutional capital deployment.
Most importantly, the realization of yields:
Janus Henderson, a global asset manager managing $373 billion, launched the Anemoy AAACLO fund—a fully on-chain AAA-rated secured loan security. Managed by the same team as its $21.4 billion AAACLO ETF. Announced in July 2025, plans to add $250 million on Avalanche. What does this mean? A real, large-scale asset manager is using genuine capital to validate Centrifuge’s yield model.
Grove Capital’s allocation (an institutional credit protocol in Sky ecosystem) commits $1 billion. This project involves teams from Deloitte, Citigroup, Block Tower Capital, and Hildene Capital Management. Initial capital of $50 million, with clear milestones. It’s the largest institutional RWA commitment in any blockchain ecosystem.
On January 8, 2026, Chronicle Labs partnered with Centrifuge to launch an asset proof framework. This provides cryptographic verification of holdings data, supporting transparent NAV calculation, custody verification, and compliance reporting. Why is this important? Because for institutional investors, yield calculations must be transparent, verifiable, auditable. Chronicle’s solution is the first to provide verifiable data without sacrificing on-chain efficiency.
Centrifuge’s operational logic:
Unlike competitors, Centrifuge tokenizes credit strategies directly at issuance. The process:
AAA assets offer an APY of 3.3%-4.6%, with the lowest risk. However, this yield appears conservative compared to higher-risk, higher-return opportunities in DeFi, limiting appeal. But this conservative approach attracts institutional investors—who prioritize stability and predictability over maximum returns.
Centrifuge also launched multi-chain V3 architecture supporting Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Celo, and Avalanche. This means yield-bearing assets can flow across multiple ecosystems.
Canton Network: On-Chain Infrastructure for Wall Street
Canton is a response to DeFi’s permissionless ethos, tailored for institutional-grade use. Participants include DTCC, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Citadel Securities—names representing Wall Street’s core.
What’s Canton’s goal? To target the $3.7 quadrillion annual settlement flow processed by DTCC in 2024. Yes, you read that right, $3,700 trillion.
DTCC partnership (announced December 2025):
This isn’t just a pilot. DTCC and Euroclear jointly chair the Canton Foundation—not just participants but leaders. This collaboration enables some US Treasuries, held in custody by DTCC, to be tokenized natively on Canton. A production MVP is planned for the first half of 2026.
Why is this important? Because it signifies core financial infrastructure of traditional finance entering blockchain. Tokenized US Treasuries are just the beginning; future expansion could include corporate bonds, equities, and structured products.
Temple Digital platform (launched January 8, 2026):
Canton’s value proposition for institutions is clearly demonstrated on the private trading platform launched by Temple Digital Group. It offers sub-second matching speeds via a non-custodial central limit order book. Currently supports cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, with plans to launch tokenized stocks and commodities in 2026.
Partners include Franklin Templeton (managing $82.8 billion in money market funds) and JPMorgan (via JPM Coin for payments and settlement).
Canton’s privacy architecture is unique:
Built on smart contract-level, using Daml. Contracts specify data visibility levels for each participant. Regulators can access full audit logs; counterparties can see transaction details; competitors and the public see nothing. State updates propagate atomically across the network.
For institutions used to Bloomberg terminals and dark pools, Canton’s architecture offers a perfect match: blockchain efficiency without revealing trading strategies. Wall Street will never put proprietary trading activity on a transparent public ledger—Canton understands this.
Canton has attracted over 300 participating institutions. But honestly, many reported transactions are likely pilot tests rather than production volume. Development speed is a limitation—planned MVP delivery in the first half of 2026 reflects multi-quarter planning cycles. In contrast, DeFi platforms often launch new products within weeks.
Polymesh: Protocol-Level Compliance and Yield
Polymesh’s differentiation lies in protocol-level compliance verification, not complex smart contracts. Designed specifically for regulated securities, Polymesh performs compliance checks at the consensus layer.
Key features:
Production integrations:
The advantage is clear: no need for custom smart contract audits; the protocol automatically adapts to regulatory changes; non-compliant transfers are impossible.
But the challenge is isolation. Polymesh runs as a standalone chain, isolated from DeFi liquidity. To address this, a bridge to Ethereum is planned for Q2 2026. This is crucial for diversification of yield assets—only connected to Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem can Polymesh assets gain more liquidity and trading opportunities.
Market Segmentation of the Five Platforms: Yield Structures Drive Choice
These five platforms are not direct competitors but serve different institutional needs and yield structures:
Institutions won’t choose the “best blockchain” but the infrastructure that offers the best combination of yield, compliance, and privacy.
Three Major Unresolved Challenges
Cross-chain liquidity fragmentation
This is my biggest concern. Cross-chain costs are $130-$150 million annually, causing price differences of 1%-3% for the same asset across chains. If unresolved by 2030, annual costs could exceed $75 billion. Even with advanced tokenization infrastructure, if liquidity is dispersed across incompatible chains, all efficiency gains vanish.
Privacy vs. transparency conflict
Institutions need confidentiality; regulators require auditability. In multi-party scenarios (issuers, investors, rating agencies, regulators, auditors), each needs different visibility. No perfect solution exists yet.
Regulatory fragmentation
MiCA applies in 27 EU countries; US case-by-case No-Action Letters take months; cross-border flows face legal conflicts. These issues directly impact cross-national deployment of yield assets.
Key Milestones for 2026
Q1: Ondo launches on Solana Deploys 98+ tokenized stocks to test if retail-scale liquidity can be sustained. Success indicators: 100,000+ holders, proving retail demand for yield assets.
H1: Canton’s DTCC MVP Verifies blockchain’s feasibility in US government bond settlement. Success could unlock trillions of dollars flowing into on-chain infrastructure.
Throughout the year: Centrifuge’s Grove deployment Complete $1 billion allocation. Tests real capital operation and yield realization in institutional credit tokenization.
Throughout the year: Rayls’ AmFi ecosystem Target $1 billion in tokenized assets. Tests institutional adoption of privacy infrastructure.
Growth Path from $19.7B to $2-4T
By 2030, the goal is $2-4 trillion in tokenized assets—50-100x growth from current $197 million.
Industry forecasts:
Milestone of hundreds of billions expected around 2027-2028:
This requires a 5x increase from current levels. But considering the institutional momentum in late 2025 and upcoming regulatory clarity, this target is not out of reach.
Why These Five Platforms Matter
The institutional RWA landscape in early 2026 shows an unexpected trend: no single winner, because no single market.
From $8.5 billion (early 2024) to $19.7 billion (early 2026), growth has surpassed speculation. The choices of financial managers, asset managers, and banks point to a fact: yields are no longer just theoretical—they are the real driver of on-chain deployment.
Each protocol addresses different problems, offers different yield structures, and matches different institutional needs:
The next 18 months are decisive. Execution beats architecture; results beat blueprints. The realization of yields and institutional adoption rates across these platforms will determine the future trajectory of tokenization.
Traditional finance is undergoing a long-term on-chain migration. These five protocols provide the essential infrastructure for institutional capital. Their success will define the next decade: whether tokenization is merely an efficiency upgrade of existing structures or a complete overhaul replacing traditional financial intermediaries.
The infrastructure choices made by institutions in 2026 will shape the industry landscape for the next ten years. The sustainability and execution of yields are the ultimate test.