Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
When it comes to distributed storage, Walrus has recently attracted a lot of developers' attention. Its technical architecture connects several fields—DeFi, Web3 applications, and even traditional industries—making it a good bridging tool.
On the developer side, the Walrus Sites feature is particularly interesting. Simply put, you can deploy fully decentralized websites directly on the Sui network without relying on any centralized servers. What does this mean? The storage costs for developing dApps are significantly reduced. Specific scenarios include: storing NFT media files on-chain, efficiently distributing resources for on-chain games, and hosting data for decentralized social platforms—these issues now have new solutions.
Considering cost and flexibility, this does help promote the infrastructure development of the entire Web3 ecosystem.
But to be honest, can decentralized websites really run stably? How's the internet speed?
The Sui ecosystem is about to ramp up again; lower developer costs will bring everyone in.
NFT on-chain storage indeed has many pain points; I am optimistic about this direction.
The topic is a bit broad; let's wait and see real data.
Reducing storage costs is no small matter; in DeFi, cost is the most important, I agree.
Web3 infrastructure should definitely invest heavily in this.
I'm just worried it might be another PPT concept; in practice, it still feels expensive.
Sui's move is good; it adds another attractive point.
It seems developers will be very receptive; who doesn't love reducing costs?