Live Nation seeks to suspend the Department of Justice's above-judgment ruling.

Investing.com - Live Nation Entertainment Inc. (NYSE:LYN) is requesting a federal judge to pause an antitrust case brought by the Department of Justice and dozens of state attorneys general so it can appeal the judge’s decision last week to deny dismissing the case. This move comes one week before the trial begins.

The case is scheduled for March 2 in the U.S. District Court in New York, presided over by Judge Arun Subramanian. On Wednesday, Subramanian dismissed allegations that the company monopolized the concert promotion market and harmed fans by raising ticket prices, but allowed most of the case to proceed. This includes accusations that Live Nation bundled its outdoor venue usage with concert promotion services and monopolized the ticketing market.

Live Nation argues that most of the remaining allegations should be dismissed and seeks to delay the trial during the appeal process. Much of the case focuses on alleged harm caused by Live Nation to major concert venues, which the government defines as stadiums and outdoor theaters with over 8,000 seats that host at least 10 concerts annually. The company is accused of discriminating against these venues, requiring them to use its ticketing services if they want to host Live Nation concerts.

The defendant is seeking certification for an interlocutory appeal of the court’s February 18, 2026, summary judgment order under 28 U.S. Code § 1292(b). The company argues that the court’s rulings on two key legal issues involve substantial disagreements, and resolving each would significantly alter and narrow the scope of the upcoming jury trial.

In a filing on Saturday, the company stated that if the court certifies one or both issues for immediate appeal, additional proceedings should be paused until the appeal is resolved. Live Nation asserts that considerations of judicial economy and public interest strongly support halting the litigation to avoid wasting resources of all parties, the court, and the jury on claims likely to be found legally flawed on appeal.

This article was translated with artificial intelligence assistance. For more information, see our Terms of Use.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)