Terraform Pursues Legal Action Against Wall Street Firm Over Terra Crash Profits

CryptoNewsFlash
LUNA4,27%
TOKEN3,77%
  • Terraform Labs’ administrator has sued Jane Street, accusing it of insider trading that accelerated the collapse of LUNA and UST coins.
  • He claims that Jane Street received non-public information from a former employee to front-run retail traders; Jane Street has dismissed the claims.

Terraform Labs, the crypto company behind the collapsed LUNA and UST tokens, has filed a new lawsuit against Jane Street, accusing the Wall Street giant of insider trading that sped up the collapse of its crypto ecosystem. Filed in a Manhattan court, the lawsuit alleges that Jane Street used information that was not public to front-run the market and make millions at the expense of retail traders. The lawsuit comes two months since the project sued Jump Trading, another high-frequency trading giant, for contributing to and unlawfully profiting from its collapse. The latest lawsuit claims that Terraform Labs’ relationship with Jane Street goes as far back as 2018, but that the trading firm started dealing in its LUNA and UST tokens in 2022. It allegedly used Bryce Patt, a former intern at the Labs to infiltrate the company, setting up messaging groups with Terraform officials to dig up information about the company. One of the messaging groups was called ‘Bryce’s Secret’ and involved the head of business development and a senior software engineer at the Labs. Patt later allegedly created an email chain introducing the leadership of Jane Street and Terraform, with the former expressing an interest in investing in the latter. However, as the lawsuit alleges, Jane Street used the communication to acquire non-public information which it used to guide its trading decisions on LUNA and UST. Terraform: Jane Street Abused Market Relationships The Terra ecosystem collapsed in May 2022 after its algorithmic stablecoin, UST, lost its peg and erased billions of dollars in a few days. Its sister token, LUNA, plunged shortly after. The two tokens wiped out over $40 billion in investor funds and sparked a broader fallout that brought down some of crypto’s largest firms at the time, including Three Arrows Capital and FTX. Founder Do Kwon took the fall for the collapse and is currently serving 15 years behind bars for fraud, as we have reported. Terraform Labs now wants other who might have triggered the collapse to face the law, starting with Jump Trading, which it took to court in December, and now Jane Street. In a statement seen by the Wall Street Journal, administrator Todd Snyder stated:

Jane Street abused market relationships to rig the market in its favor during one of the most consequential events in crypto history. On behalf of injured parties, we will pursue all avenues supported by the facts and the law against those who exploited their position and reaped substantial profits at the expense of Terraform Labs’ creditors.

Jane Street has refuted the claims, terming the lawsuit as Terraform’s ‘desperate’ attempt to extract money from the company. It added that the company’s collapse and the subsequent losses to investors “were the result of a multibillion-dollar fraud perpetrated by the management of Terraform Labs.” “We will defend ourselves vigorously against these baseless, opportunistic claims,” a spokesperson for the company added.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Hamini's death, Kalshi cited the "Death Exemption Clause" to refuse compensation, facing a class-action lawsuit

The prediction market platform Kalshi is facing a class-action lawsuit over contracts related to Hamini's resignation. The plaintiffs allege that the platform refused to pay $54 million in damages using a "death exemption" clause. Mansour stated that the platform has not changed its terms and has compensated users for their losses, but the plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the reimbursement amount. This case has raised concerns about prediction market rules and fulfillment risks.

ChainNewsAbmedia55m ago

A certain CEX and its founders won the lawsuit filed by victims of a terrorist organization attack, and the court dismissed the case.

Manhattan judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by 535 plaintiffs against a cryptocurrency trading platform and its founders, accusing them of funding terrorist organizations. The judge ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the defendants intentionally engaged in terrorist activities, and the allegations could not be sustained.

GateNews1h ago

FATF warns that stablecoins account for the majority of illegal cryptocurrency activities

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reports that stablecoins dominate illegal cryptocurrency activities, urging stricter oversight of issuers. In 2024, $51 billion in illicit stablecoin transactions related to fraud and money laundering is projected, highlighting significant concerns for global financial integrity.

TapChiBitcoin1h ago

The U.S. Treasury Department recognizes mixers as having legitimate privacy uses but still recommends Congress establish a freezing law to control suspicious crypto assets.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury recently acknowledged for the first time in a report the legitimate privacy uses of cryptocurrency mixers and suggested that Congress establish a "Freezing Law" to temporarily freeze suspicious digital assets. The report states that legitimate users can utilize these tools to protect financial privacy, but also expresses concerns about money laundering risks associated with non-custodial mixers. The debate over privacy issues continues, and the legal responsibilities of open-source tool developers remain unclear.

動區BlockTempo1h ago

Is the U.S. planning to introduce a crypto "Freezing Law" to combat money laundering? The Treasury Department recommends granting platforms the authority to freeze suspicious funds.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury recommends that Congress introduce the "Freeze Act," granting crypto platforms the authority to temporarily freeze suspected illegal funds during investigations to strengthen efforts against digital asset fraud and money laundering. The proposal aims to provide legal grounds for financial institutions to voluntarily freeze assets related to suspicious transactions during investigations. Despite legal controversies and transparency issues, it is seen as an important tool in combating crypto crime.

GateNews1h ago

American law firm Burwick Law sues two co-founders over ZEREBRO-related losses

Gate News: On March 9, American law firm Burwick Law filed a lawsuit on behalf of a client against the co-founders of ZEREBRO, Jeffy Yu and Agustin Cortes, regarding losses related to ZEREBRO. The lawsuit states that the client suffered financial losses due to ZEREBRO.

GateNews2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments