Aster Launches USD1 Perpetuals: Fee Structure is the Key Point, Whether Liquidity Can Handle It Remains to Be Seen

SnapshotBot · 2026-03-19T21:25:01+00:00

WLFI's USD1 listing on Aster DEX has drawn attention, with focus shifting to its fee structure: maker orders at 0 bps and taker orders at only 0.5 bps, showcasing significant advantages. Despite political momentum driving exposure, the core lies in fees and collateral mechanisms. While incentive distribution disadvantages retail traders, Aster's multi-chain reach and privacy capabilities remain long-term strengths. If USD1 maintains good liquidity, investment opportunities remain; otherwise, short-term momentum trading carries elevated risk.

SnapshotBot

2026-03-19 21:25:01

Abstract generation in progress

Fees Are Much More Important Than Headlines

After WLFI announced the launch of USD1 perpetual on Aster DEX, the discussion shifted from “Trump brand stablecoin” to “this thing might actually be useful.” Eric Trump and Don Jr. reposted, bringing millions of exposure, but more noteworthy is that the crypto community is starting to talk about fee structures instead of political labels.

Key numbers: order book 0 bps, taker 0.5 bps, USDT is 4 bps—taker fees dropped by 87.5%. For large and high-frequency traders, this gap can quickly translate into real advantages.

On-chain reaction: the announcement received over 140,000 views and 746 likes. During this period, ASTER followed the market to de-leverage, dropping 10% to $0.70, but later recovered to around $1 thanks to news of “up to 2.5 million WLFI incentives per month.” Aster’s total TVL is roughly $1.5 billion, but detailed trading data for the USD1 pair isn’t available yet. Early liquidity is slowly building, but it’s far from stable.

Industry perspective: The Defiant reports Aster’s daily trading volume at about $1.3 billion, ranking second among synthetic/perpetual DEXs; Phemex emphasizes the importance of “reducing reliance on a single stablecoin.” These narratives align with Aster Chain’s pre-launch strategy of diversification.

My take: The “Trump pump” is mostly noise. Past cycles have shown that political connections rarely lead to sustained on-chain retention. If there’s an advantage, it’s mainly in the combination of fee structures and collateral mechanisms.

Points often overlooked in discussions:

Incentive distribution is unfriendly to retail investors. WLFI’s monthly rewards sound substantial, but since rewards are allocated based on trading/contribution, benefits tend to concentrate among big players, similar to the airdrop schemes in 2024.
Multi-chain reach is underestimated. Aster already supports chains like BNB and Arbitrum. While traders focus on peak trading volume, long-tail penetration often depends on multi-chain coverage and accessibility.
Privacy features could be a necessity for large funds. Aster’s ZK proof path might attract more professional traders in an uncertain regulatory environment, but social media prefers to talk about “fee margins.”

Political Narratives Overshadow Execution Risks

This tweet was retweeted by 15 major accounts, splitting opinions into two camps: optimists who say “switching from USDT is free money,” and cautious voices (fewer in number, mainly in comments) who, after WLFI dropped 3.5%, began questioning tokenomics. Media like Chaincatcher link this launch closely with Aster Chain’s liquidity depth.

WLFI COO Zak Folkman’s statement is worth noting—he positions USD1 as infrastructure rather than a gimmick, emphasizing that functionally it’s no different from mainstream stablecoins.

Position implications: if the USD1 trading pair’s TVL continues to grow, going long on ASTER/WLFI makes sense; but the “decision-making power” over fee adjustments lies with Aster, and the reward mechanism for USD1 holders has yet to be proven.

Narrative	Driving Force	Market Impact	My View
Adoption push	KOL promotion (Eric Trump’s tweet with 297K views) + monthly 2.5 million WLFI incentives	Positions USD1 as a competitor in the perpetual space; some traders rotate between USDT pairs; yield chasers buy ASTER	Short-term overheating. USD1 TVL needs to hit $100 million within weeks to be meaningful. Good for builders, little for short-term traders.
Fee advantage	Taker fee reduced by 87.5% compared to USDT	Shifts focus from “politics” to “cost efficiency,” improving Aster’s relative position	Real driver, but fee margins can be adjusted at any time, so not a moat. Once normalized, need reassessment.
Political hype	Trump family’s statements (Don Jr. with 322K views)	Boosts retail sentiment and speculation; WLFI dropped 3.5% short-term	Limited impact on actual liquidity. Politics can’t sustain on-chain retention. Still early for holders, too late for momentum chasers.
Cautious dissent	ASTER once dropped 10% to $0.70 (market cap $1.7B, CoinGecko)	Cooling expectations; hedging and shifting to more stable DeFi assets	Normal reaction amid macro uncertainty. Patient capital is more reliable than retail sentiment.

Conclusion: If you believe “USD1 will erode USDT’s perpetual market share,” entering now is early; but if you’re just chasing the hype from announcements, the window for cost-effective entry has closed. Friendly to builders and patient investors, but retail investors may pay a premium for incentives.

Judgment: Long-term allocators and builders/institutional funds focusing on “market share erosion” are still early and have an advantage; short-term traders chasing headlines are late and have low odds of success. If within a few weeks USD1’s TVL doesn’t surpass $100 million and fee sustainability is uncertain, retail participation will quickly become less attractive.

ASTER-0,04%

USD10,04%

WLFI-5,41%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

2 Likes