Just been thinking about something Elon Musk brought up at VivaTech Paris back in 2024 that doesn't get nearly enough attention. He's been pretty vocal that universal high income is basically inevitable, but here's the thing—he's not exactly optimistic about how it plays out.



The core issue Musk keeps circling back to is AI. He's convinced that advances in artificial intelligence will eventually make most jobs obsolete. Not in some distant sci-fi future, but within a timeframe we should actually be paying attention to. When AI and robots can do basically everything better than humans, what happens to the job market? That's the uncomfortable question nobody wants to sit with.

Now, here's where it gets interesting. Musk distinguishes between universal basic income and what he calls universal high income. In his view, when AI takes over most productive work, governments won't be able to get away with just basic income—they'll need to provide something substantially higher. As he put it at the conference, in a benign scenario, none of us would have jobs, but we'd have universal high income with no shortage of goods or services since AI would handle production.

But the real concern Musk keeps coming back to isn't economic—it's existential. Most people find purpose and meaning through work. Strip that away, and you're looking at potential societal fragmentation and widespread depression. If computers and robots outperform you at everything, what's the point? That's the psychological weight of this transition.

That said, Musk does see a potential middle ground. He thinks jobs could become optional—something you do if you want, like a hobby, rather than a necessity. AI handles the heavy lifting, humans contribute if they choose to. In theory, that's the best of both worlds: abundance without meaninglessness.

The catch? Even in Musk's optimistic scenario, universal high income—not basic income—becomes mandatory. It's not about charity or ideology anymore; it's about economic necessity when human labor becomes largely redundant. Worth watching how this actually develops.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin