Continuing from the previous article on the Nature Select team's empathy assessment method, I also reviewed their MAPO training approach. The purpose of this training method is to enable the model to maintain a stable "empathy persona" during multi-turn interactions and provide relatively consistent responses.

In other words, the focus of this methodology is on the behavioral performance of the Agent itself, rather than understanding a true psychological model, guiding human-computer interaction toward clear "health/goodness."

Moreover, both papers lack an operational definition of "empathy." From the text, it can be understood roughly as "the ability to demonstrate understanding, support, reassurance, and non-aggressive responses in conversations." This definition is clearly not deep enough, and the fuzziness of the concept is not conducive to researchers truly addressing the structural issues of Agent human-computer relationships.

Original text: