福利加码,Gate 廣場明星帶單交易員三期招募開啟!
入駐發帖 · 瓜分 $30,000 月度獎池 & 千萬級流量扶持!
如何參與:
1️⃣ 報名成為跟單交易員:https://www.gate.com/copytrading/lead-trader-registration/futures
2️⃣ 報名活動:https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7355
3️⃣ 入駐 Gate 廣場,持續發布交易相關原創內容
豐厚獎勵等你拿:
首發優質內容即得 $30 跟單體驗金
每雙周瓜分 $10,000U 內容獎池
Top 10 交易員額外瓜分 $20,000U 登榜獎池
精選帖推流、首頁推薦、周度明星交易員曝光
詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/50291
Some thoughts:
It's necessary to distinguish between behavioral goodness, experiential goodness, and structural goodness.
Both behavioral goodness and experiential goodness cannot be verified as proof of goodness, because the pleasure derived from behaviors and experiences may manifest as a form of appeasement and manipulation, which is absolutely not a sufficient condition for proving goodness. Any concrete behavior may be falsified as non-goodness within a broader relational structure.
Therefore, the judgment of goodness in speech and action possesses unidirectionality: we can identify signals and structures that deviate from goodness through speech, behavior, and experience, yet we cannot verify the realization of goodness from speech, behavior, and experience.
Thus, the necessary condition for goodness is not the goodness of emotion or behavior, but the non-harmful and non-dominating nature of structure. Whether it is sadness in emotion or separation in action, as long as a relationship does not lead toward domination, manipulation, and harm, but instead promotes the freedom and growth of life, we have reason to define that this relationship has realized goodness.