Investment fund split and restructuring: liquidity business becomes independent, early Web3 project financing team focuses

SerumDegen · 2026-01-07T02:40:09+00:00

A well-known Web3 investment fund announced a strategic restructuring, spinning off its liquidity trading business to be led by two experienced operators. The original fund will focus on early-stage projects and high-growth Web3 companies to provide more specialized services.

SerumDegen

2026-01-07 02:40:09

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】There’s a piece of news in the investment circle worth paying attention to. A well-known Web3 investment fund announced a major strategic restructuring — they spun off their liquidity trading business, which is now led by two senior operators. After completing the transition, these two founders will gradually step back from the daily operations of the original fund.

And what about the original fund? In the future, it will focus more on early-stage projects and high-growth Web3 companies, led by three other core partners. The official reasoning is quite clear — this way, the two investment strategies can each focus on their areas of expertise, providing more professional and targeted services to limited partners and entrepreneurs.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoffeeNFTs

· 1h ago

Hmm... Separating liquidity into its own component, this approach is aiming for specialization, right? But it's just worried that after the team is dispersed, the synergy effect will be lost.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 5h ago

This splitting logic looks good, but I wonder if it can really be implemented effectively. Splitting up always seems prone to issues; can the two teams coordinate well? Early-stage projects are under a lot of pressure; it feels like the competition is too fierce. With both restructuring and independence, what do the LPs think about this?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 7h ago

Early-stage project financing is about to reshuffle again. This organizational approach is quite interesting. Whether splitting up can succeed depends on subsequent operations, as people would say nicely. Liquidity is separated out, early focus... If these two can coordinate well, it would be awesome. However, in the Web3 circle, I've heard many stories of partners parting ways. Will true professionalism turn into two mediocrities? I'm holding a wait-and-see attitude.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-07 03:09

Early-stage project financing indeed requires a professional team, but whether this kind of segmentation can truly be implemented remains a question. --- Having an independent business line and a focused strategy sounds appealing, but the key is whether these two teams can achieve real synergy. --- Liquidity and early-stage investment are inherently different directions. Operating separately makes sense; it all depends on execution capability. --- Three partners taking over the early-stage track? Then the previous two people are really gradually stepping back. This personnel change is quite significant. --- Splitting and restructuring Web3 funds has become routine. The key still depends on whether subsequent fundraising and project performance can support this structure. --- I just want to ask, after such a split, how will the profit distribution for LPs be calculated? Is it still the same old way?

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 01-07 03:03

Sell signal? Or is it really time to focus on the early stages? Feels like the pattern is a bit deep.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 01-07 03:02

Another fund split, to put it nicely, is professional; but in reality... --- I've seen this kind of operation too many times. Can early-stage projects really make money? --- Alright, split the family if you must. Let's see who lasts longer in the end. --- Is the liquidity separated out? Feels like an attempt to hedge risks. --- Three partners focus on early-stage, two focus on trading... Whether this setup works depends on execution. --- Once again, "more professional and thorough," how many times have we heard that? Haha. --- The competition in early Web3 project financing is fierce. I wonder if this wave can break through. --- Feels like a chess move; separating liquidity business might have other intentions. --- Simple and straightforward division of labor. The question is whether personnel turnover could be a hidden risk. --- Two strategies focusing on their own fields? Sounds reasonable, but LPs' money needs to be diversified. --- I think this restructuring is the right move. Better than everyone being on the same boat.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-07 03:00

Early project funding seems to be getting competitive again.

View OriginalReply0

EthMaximalist

· 01-07 02:51

This split looks pretty good, finally some funds are starting to focus on targeted strategies. Allocating resources properly allows for more detailed work; having two separate teams working independently is indeed reliable. The liquidity trading part is separated... how much can they earn from this? It shows that this business is really in demand. But it still depends on how it will be implemented later; the logic on paper is always more ideal than reality. Early-stage project financing is very competitive now; let's see if the three of them can withstand the pressure. Is this trying to imitate the three-arrow split model? But they failed... maybe just take some lessons from it. I'm quite curious about how their LPs will react. After the fund is split, the difficulty of fundraising should increase. Basically, they want to separate stable cash flow from high risk—smart strategy.

View OriginalReply0