The crypto community has recently been flooded with a seemingly “stupid yet very real” question: If a one-time dumping of 2 billion dollars worth of Bitcoin (BTC) could cause instant dumping, why has Michael Saylor and the ETF army continuously bought 83 billion dollars over the past year without being able to send the BTC price to the moon? This question was raised by Bitcoin influencer Crypto Tea on X (formerly Twitter), sparking heated discussions. Bitcoin analyst Plan C quickly provided an explanation - the answer lies not in the amount, but in the speed, execution method, and market structure.
The core idea of Plan C is very simple:
A single massive dumping (e.g., 2 billion dollars) = instant clearing of the order book, price plummets sharply, like a piano falling from the tenth floor.
Long-term phased buying (e.g., $83 billion a year) = algorithmic diversified ordering, integrating market liquidity, avoiding rapid price spikes.
In other words, prices react most strongly to “marginal trading” rather than responding linearly to “annual totals.”
In 2025, the allocation of BTC by ETFs and institutional investors is highly decentralized:
Exchange + Over-the-Counter (OTC) Dual Channel Execution
Algorithmic ordering: Automatically split large orders to reduce market impact.
Liquidity Optimization: Enter during high trading volume periods to avoid pushing up prices.
This kind of “slow build-up” buying is more about stabilizing holding costs rather than creating a short-term price surge.
Crypto Tea further inquired: “What about paper Bitcoin (Paper BTC)?”
Plan C acknowledges that there is an unknown X factor: if there is a large circulation of IOUs or synthetic BTC (such as internal exchange certificates) in the market, the reported “buying volume” may just be on-paper figures and may not actually remove real BTC from the market. This would dilute the true buying pressure, making the price response much more subdued.
Concentrated and sudden: dumping usually occurs within a short period of time, directly breaking through multiple support levels.
Liquidity vacuum: Especially during weekends or periods of low trading activity, buy orders are insufficient to absorb selling pressure.
Panic chain reaction: triggering stop-losses and leveraged liquidations, amplifying the decline.
In contrast, if the buying pressure is too concentrated, it will instead be “absorbed by sell orders” from sellers, creating price resistance.
The trend of BTC prices depends not only on the scale of capital but also on:
Trading Rhythm (One-time vs. Long-term Installments)
Execution Methods (Market Order vs. Algorithmic Order)
Market Structure (Real BTC vs. Paper BTC)
Liquidity environment (peak times vs. off-peak times)
So, the next time you see news like “$2 billion dumping triggered a crash,” don't rush to simply compare it with “$83 billion buy orders can't move the market”—because one is a sudden shock, while the other is a slow boil, and the effects are naturally worlds apart.