-
Sam Bankman-Fried says new testimony shows FTX assets exceeded deposits despite liquidity gap.
-
Former data chief Dan Chapsky claimed customers could have been repaid within months.
-
SBF seeks retrial in Manhattan, alleging new evidence and prosecutorial pressure.
Sam Bankman-Fried renewed claims this week that FTX remained solvent during its November 2022 collapse, citing new sworn testimony. Posting through a proxy on X, the former CEO referenced a declaration from a senior former executive. The move comes as Bankman-Fried, now imprisoned, pursues a new trial in Manhattan federal court.
Sworn Declaration From Former FTX Data Chief
According to Sam Bankman-Fried, the most qualified person to assess FTX’s finances was Dan Chapsky. Chapsky served as head of data science at FTX and later worked with bankruptcy attorneys. Notably, those lawyers hired him to calculate whether the exchange was solvent.
In his sworn declaration, Chapsky stated that FTX International faced an $8 billion liquidity gap on November 11, 2022. However, he wrote that assets still exceeded customer deposits. Based on asset values at the time, he concluded the exchange remained solvent despite liquidity stress. He added that customers could have been repaid within months, not years, absent an omnibus bankruptcy.
Solvency Claims and Bankruptcy Findings
Bankman-Fried said Chapsky’s conclusions align with findings from the bankruptcy court’s independent examiner. He argued that the shutdown prevented faster customer recoveries. Meanwhile, he emphasized that liquidity shortfalls differ from insolvency under standard financial definitions.
However, the exchange entered bankruptcy proceedings shortly after withdrawals halted. The declaration focuses on asset coverage, not operational continuity. Chapsky framed his analysis around asset ownership and estimated recovery timelines.
New Trial Effort and Legal Challenges
Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud tied to FTX’s collapse. He recently filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial. The filing was submitted in Manhattan federal court and supported by his mother, Barbara Fried.
The motion argues that new witness evidence could weaken the prosecution’s case. It highlights the absence of testimony from former FTX executive Ryan Salame. Salame later faced federal convictions after separate proceedings.
Bankman-Fried also alleged prosecutorial misconduct, claiming witnesses faced pressure from the Department of Justice. He asked Judge Lewis Kaplan to recuse himself. However, appellate judges have questioned whether solvency was central to the original verdict.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
CFTC Grants "No-Action" Letter to Phantom Technologies
The CFTC issued a "no-action" letter to Phantom Technologies, allowing it to connect users to regulated futures markets without registering as a broker. This decision promotes transparency for non-custodial wallet developers and may guide future regulations.
TapChiBitcoin1h ago
BITGIN Goddess Suspected of Money Laundering NT$150 Million, Prosecutors Seek 12-Year Sentence
Taiwan cryptocurrency exchange BITGIN involved in money laundering case. Among 10 defendants, the core suspects are the Zhang siblings, allegedly using the exchange to cover for a fraud ring laundering 150 million Taiwan dollars. Defendants include a lawyer and the actual operator. The case involves multiple money flows and offshore accounts that hindered investigations. Zhang Yuting previously guided police in tracing cryptocurrency but ultimately became an accomplice to fraud. The case remains under trial.
MarketWhisper1h ago
Arizona Charges Kalshi with 20 Criminal Counts: Unlicensed Gambling + Accepting Election Bets, Prediction Market Lawsuit Intensifies
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has brought 20 criminal charges against prediction market platform Kalshi, including operating unlicensed gambling and accepting election betting. The charges cover the 2028 presidential election and multiple local elections, demonstrating the state government's regulatory stance on prediction markets. Kalshi has previously filed litigation attempting to use federal regulations as a defense, indicating that conflicts between federal and state law could impact the entire prediction market industry.
動區BlockTempo2h ago
BETS OFF Bill Blocks War Betting, Trump Family Named in Conflict of Interest
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy and Representative Greg Casar introduced the BETS OFF Act, aimed at prohibiting prediction market betting on wars, terrorism, and government decisions to prevent profiting from classified government information. The bill points out suspicious betting activity that may be related to the Trump family, emphasizing the necessity of regulating prediction markets.
MarketWhisper2h ago
Arizona Attorney General Files Criminal Lawsuit Against Kalshi for Operating Illegal Gambling
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has filed criminal charges against prediction market platform Kalshi, alleging illegal gambling and accepting bets on elections in violation of state law. Kalshi is also facing legal proceedings in other states.
GateNews3h ago
Shandong Court Rules on Entrusted Virtual Currency Investment Loss Case, Determines Investor Must Bear Loss
A court in Zhangqiu District, Jinan City, Shandong Province heard a virtual currency investment case and ruled that Liu's entrustment contract for investing in "Alpha Coin" was invalid because his participation in illegal financial activities means he must bear the loss himself. The judge warned that virtual currency transactions are not protected by law.
GateNews3h ago
