The Federal Reserve outlined plans to clarify digital asset rules and explore a capital framework for stablecoin issuers, as Vice Chair Michelle W. Bowman described recent and proposed supervisory changes in testimony before the Senate Banking Committee.
Fed Commits to Clarifying Digital Asset Rules for Banks
Digital asset regulation is taking a more defined shape within U.S. bank supervision. Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman delivered testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on Feb. 26, outlining actions already taken and additional steps planned to support responsible digital asset innovation within the regulated banking system.
“The Federal Reserve is encouraging banks to innovate to improve the products and services they provide. We have rescinded several policies that were intended to hinder innovation,” Vice Chair for Supervision Bowman stated. “We are also working with the other banking regulators to develop regulations that include capital and liquidity for stablecoin issuers as required by the GENIUS Act.” She continued:
“We will provide clarity regarding the treatment of digital assets to ensure that the banking system is well placed to support digital asset activities. This includes clarity on the permissibility of activities and willingness to provide regulatory feedback on proposed new use cases.”
Together, these remarks reflect a recalibration of oversight for crypto custody, tokenized payments, blockchain-based services, and stablecoin issuance within prudential guardrails.
In practice, the Federal Reserve rolled back several crypto-specific supervisory hurdles in 2025. In April, it rescinded SR 22-6 / CA 22-6 and SR 23-8 / CA 23-5, ending advance notification and written non-objection requirements for crypto activities and dollar tokens. It later sunset the Novel Activities Supervision Program in August, withdrew 2023 joint crypto risk statements, replaced restrictive Regulation H guidance in December, and in February 2026 moved to codify the removal of reputational risk from supervision.
Beyond digital asset-specific measures, Bowman emphasized proportional oversight for smaller institutions that may seek to engage in emerging financial technologies. “Community banks are and should be subject to less stringent standards than large banks, and there is significant opportunity to tailor regulations and supervision to the unique needs and circumstances of these banks,” she opined, emphasizing:
“We cannot continue to push policies and supervisory expectations designed for the largest banks down to smaller, less risky, and less complex banks.”
The combined approach signals a potential recalibration of supervision, as regulators work toward stablecoin rule development and digital asset clarity within existing statutory authority.
FAQ 🧭
- What does the Federal Reserve’s new approach mean for crypto in banks?
It signals clearer rules for crypto custody, stablecoins, and tokenized payments within regulated banks.
- How will stablecoin issuers be regulated under the new framework?
They will face capital and liquidity requirements developed alongside other banking regulators.
- What changes are coming for community banks exploring digital assets?
Community banks may receive more tailored and less stringent supervision compared with large institutions.
- Why is regulatory clarity important for crypto investors?
Clear supervision reduces uncertainty and could support broader institutional adoption of digital assets.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Oil price shocks sweep the globe, but Bitcoin remains steady at $67,000: Wall Street correlation becomes a key variable
The Middle East geopolitical conflict has led to a rise in international oil prices, while Bitcoin prices remain relatively stable, staying around $67,000. The US stock market has shown resilience, with increased correlation to Bitcoin, while Asian markets are more affected. As institutional funds enter the crypto market, Bitcoin is increasingly viewed as a risk asset. Additionally, although the US has a high level of energy independence, rising oil prices may still impact inflation through consumer spending.
GateNews5m ago
Former CFTC Chair claims banks need clearer regulation more than the crypto industry, but is the argument valid?
Former CFTC Chairman Chris Giancarlo believes that American banks are unable to develop cryptocurrency businesses due to unclear regulations, but this argument requires multiple premises. Giancarlo mentioned the competitive pressure from Asia and Europe and the progress of the CLARITY Act, pointing out that regulatory uncertainty is not the only obstacle. Additionally, his claim needs to meet conditions such as the necessity for banks to enter the crypto market, which currently lacks sufficient evidence to support.
動區BlockTempo1h ago
The U.S. Treasury Department recognizes mixers as having legitimate privacy uses but still recommends Congress establish a freezing law to control suspicious crypto assets.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury recently acknowledged for the first time in a report the legitimate privacy uses of cryptocurrency mixers and suggested that Congress establish a "Freezing Law" to temporarily freeze suspicious digital assets. The report states that legitimate users can utilize these tools to protect financial privacy, but also expresses concerns about money laundering risks associated with non-custodial mixers. The debate over privacy issues continues, and the legal responsibilities of open-source tool developers remain unclear.
動區BlockTempo2h ago
Former CFTC Chairman Warns: Without Clear Cryptocurrency Regulations, U.S. Banking Sector May Fall Behind in Global Financial Competition
Former CFTC Chairman Giancarlo stated that a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies is crucial for the U.S. banking system. The lack of regulation could cause the U.S. to fall behind Asia and Europe in financial innovation. He pointed out that banks find it difficult to make large-scale investments in blockchain technology in an uncertain legal environment and warned that the U.S. might be forced to follow global digital financial trends. Even if the Crypto Market Structure Act does not pass, regulatory agencies may still implement temporary policies, but these cannot replace a stable legislative framework.
GateNews2h ago
War risk shocks global markets: oil prices surge past $110, Asian stock markets plummet, Bitcoin stays steady at $67,000
Middle Eastern geopolitical risks have intensified, leading to a sharp decline in Asian stock markets, a surge in energy prices, and crude oil surpassing $110. Despite market concerns, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin remain stable. Oil prices are expected to continue rising, but some traders anticipate a correction. The Federal Reserve's interest rate expectations remain stable, and future oil price increases could impact inflation.
GateNews2h ago
U.S. Treasury Department: Mixing tools for legitimate privacy purposes, policy reversal after three years of sanctions
The U.S. Department of the Treasury in its report acknowledged that cryptocurrency mixers can be used for legitimate financial privacy and recommended legislation to establish a freezing law that allows financial institutions to temporarily freeze suspicious digital assets. At the same time, the report disclosed data on North Korea using mixers for money laundering and proposed compliance recommendations for decentralized finance. This shift in stance stems from federal court rulings and assessments of the impact of mixers.
MarketWhisper4h ago
