A Bitcoin toll scam appeared in the Strait of Hormuz, and after a ship paid, it was still shelled

MarketWhisper
BTC2,22%

Bitcoin Toll Scam

According to CoinDesk’s April 22 report, Marisks, a maritime risk services firm in Greece, issued a warning saying scammers are impersonating Iranian authorities and sending messages to multiple shipping companies to demand Bitcoin or USDT as “tolls” to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Marisks confirmed that the relevant messages are not coming from official Iranian channels, and, according to Reuters, said it believes at least one ship was deceived and still came under shelling when it attempted to pass over the weekend.

Marisks Warns: Original Scam Message vs. Verification Statement

According to the scam message posted publicly by Marisks, the message’s original text states: “After submitting the documents and having our eligibility assessed by Iran’s security departments, we will determine the fee that must be paid in cryptocurrency (BTC or USDT). At that time, your vessel may pass through the strait freely during the agreed time.”

In its statement, Marisks said, “These specific messages are a scam,” and confirmed the content is not from any official Iranian channel. According to Reuters, Marisks believes that after at least one ship paid following deception, it was still shelled when it tried to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

Strait of Hormuz Background: Blockade Situation and Iran’s Official Crypto Fee Proposal

According to public reports, since the war between the United States and Israel against Iran began on February 28, 2026, Iran has essentially blocked shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, and currently about 20,000 tankers and cargo ships are stuck in the bay. About a week ago, U.S. President Trump ordered a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and has already seized an Iranian vessel that attempted to evade the blockade.

On April 9, 2026, Hamid Hosseini (a spokesperson for the Federation of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Petrochemical Products Exporters), said that Iran had previously proposed charging vessels transiting through the strait a crypto toll, with the fee possibly calculated in Bitcoin. As of the time of CoinDesk’s report, Iran had not yet responded to the Marisks scam warning.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who issued the warning about the crypto toll scam for the Strait of Hormuz?

According to CoinDesk’s April 22, 2026 report, the warning was issued by Marisks, a maritime risk services firm in Greece. Marisks confirmed the scam messages are not from official Iranian channels and indicated it believes that at least one ship was deceived and shelled when it attempted to pass through the strait.

What cryptocurrencies did the scam message request, and what did it claim the funds were for?

According to the scam message published by Marisks, the scammers requested Bitcoin (BTC) or USDT, claiming that paying would ensure safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Did Iran officially propose charging transiting vessels crypto fees?

According to public reports, on April 9, 2026, Hamid Hosseini, a spokesperson for the Federation of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Petrochemical Products Exporters, said Iran had proposed charging crypto tolls, with the fee possibly calculated in Bitcoin; however, the scam messages warned about by Marisks have already been confirmed as not coming from official Iranian channels.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

ZachXBT Warns Against Bitcoin Depot ATM Over 44% Bitcoin Markup

ZachXBT warns Bitcoin Depot ATMs impose steep premiums—$25k fiat at $108k/BTC vs ~$75k market (about 44%), leading to ~ $7.5k loss on 0.232 BTC; also notes a $3.26M security breach. This article summarizes ZachXBT's warnings about Bitcoin Depot's pricing practices and a recent security breach, highlighting risks from inflated rates and security lapses for users.

GateNews20m ago

Privacy Protocol Umbra Shuts Down Frontend to Block Attackers from Laundering Stolen Kelp Funds

Gate News message, April 22 — Privacy protocol Umbra has shut down its frontend website to prevent attackers from using the protocol to transfer stolen funds following recent attacks, including the Kelp protocol breach that resulted in losses exceeding $280 million. Approximately $800,000 in stolen

GateNews2h ago

Misty 23pds Alert: Lazarus Group releases a new macOS toolkit targeting cryptocurrencies

Misty’s Chief Information Security Officer 23pds issued an alert on April 22, stating that the North Korean hacking group Lazarus Group has released a new native macOS malware toolkit called “Mach-O Man,”专a专专专專專專 specialized in the cryptocurrency industry and high-value enterprise executives.

MarketWhisper3h ago

Venus Protocol 攻擊者轉移 2301 枚 ETH,流入 Tornado Cash 清洗

According to the on-chain analyst Ai Auntie’s monitoring on April 22, the Venus Protocol attacker transferred 2,301 ETH (about $5.32 million) to address 0xa21…23A7f 11 hours ago, then moved the funds in batches into the crypto mixer Tornado Cash for laundering; as of the time of monitoring, the attacker still held about $17.45 million worth of ETH on-chain.

MarketWhisper5h ago

CometBFT zero-day vulnerability exposed, $8.0 billion Cosmos network nodes face a risk of permanent lockup

Security researcher Doyeon Park disclosed on April 21 that there is a high-severity zero-day vulnerability rated CVSS 7.1 in the Cosmos consensus layer CometBFT. It could allow a malicious peer node to attack nodes during the block synchronization (BlockSync) stage and cause them to deadlock, impacting a network that safeguards more than $8 billion in assets.

MarketWhisper5h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments