US Lawyer on SEC Crypto Guidance: Definition of Investment Contracts and Secondary Market Rules Still Unclear

Gate News update. On March 31, in a CoinDesk article, attorneys at the U.S. law firm Gibson Dunn, including Nick Harper, said that although the joint guidance issued by the SEC and CFTC has improved, it still has not delivered the comprehensive course correction the industry needs. The article argues that the guidance has flaws in its application of the Howey test, failing to clearly state whether an “investment contract” must include explicit contractual obligations, and instead continuing to use a vague “facts and circumstances” standard for judgment. In addition, the guidance lacks clarity regarding transactions in the secondary market; it does not clarify whether it adopts the Ripple case’s determination that “blind buy-sell” transactions do not constitute an investment contract, leaving disputed whether tokens remain considered securities when they circulate in the secondary market. The author calls on the crypto industry to actively provide feedback, asking the SEC to establish clear, permanent regulatory boundaries to prevent a repeat of “enforcement in place of regulation.”

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
No comments