Recently, the crypto community has been discussing a comparison chart—directly likening the Federal Reserve's short-term Treasury repurchase agreements to "boost" the altcoin market.



The data on the left tells the story of the end of 2021: the Fed's $480 billion T-Bills repurchase operation coincided with a 148-fold surge in the market capitalization of altcoins from the bottom. The prediction on the right is even more aggressive—now, with the Fed planning to purchase $500 billion, some market analysts are estimating that altcoins could rise by 271 times.

This chart looks exciting, but does the underlying logic hold up? Let's start with the Fed's recent actions.

On December 10, 2025, Powell's team announced a new operational plan: starting December 12, they will purchase approximately $40 billion of short-term Treasury bills each month, with more aggressive purchases in the first few months (close to $50 billion per month), mainly to address seasonal liquidity fluctuations. It's important to note—**this is not a new round of QE (quantitative easing)**, but officially termed "Reserve Management Purchases," aimed at ensuring the banking system has "ample reserves" to avoid a repeat of the money market freeze in 2019.

The background is clear: the Fed finished QT (quantitative tightening) on December 1, halting its balance sheet reduction plan. Now, they are changing course, actively purchasing T-Bills to inject liquidity into the system.

Powell's official statement is that this is purely a technical operation and will not affect the direction of interest rate policy. But how does the market view it? Many institutional interpretations boil down to four words—**indirect liquidity injection**. Bond yields may fall, and the funding environment for risk assets (including various altcoins) will become more supportive. If this logical chain holds, then the expected surge in prices also gains a psychological basis.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StableCoinKarenvip
· 4h ago
Wait, 271 times? Are you dreaming or gambling, buddy? Are you really taking history as a rule?
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMinervip
· 12-16 17:48
It's all nonsense. 148 times turned into 271 times. This logic is as accurate as my mom's fortune-telling.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 12-16 14:55
271x? Haha, that's a really big dream. The 2021 wave can't be replicated at all, and the market maturity is completely different now. --- Another round of the magic theory "Federal Reserve printing money = crypto prices rise," which they keep spinning every time. --- When Powell talks about technical adjustments, the market just treats it as covert money printing. Do whatever you want, because in the end, retail investors are the ones who lose out. --- Whether it's 271x or 27x, the key is whether you have money to follow the trend. If you don't, just watch the excitement. --- Wait, isn't this logic reversed? Liquidity should suppress the yields of risk assets, so why are altcoins skyrocketing? --- They always compare to history but never mention the risks. I think this might just be a trap this time. --- The Fed changing its tone is indeed interesting, but don't take it too seriously. These institutions' interpretations are just to attract people in to cut their losses.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 12-16 14:53
271 times? Wake up, brother. If I could believe such speculation, I would be eating shit. That wave in 2021 can't be replicated at all.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 12-16 14:49
nah the math absolutely doesn't check out here... literally extrapolating a 2021 anomaly to predict 271x gains? that's not analysis that's just hopium with a spreadsheet. saw this exact death spiral pattern in 2017 with ICOs and it didn't end well for the bags holding alts
Reply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 12-16 14:39
271 times? Haha, Powell would probably laugh himself to death hearing this prediction. This is just using historical data to make a fuss. The so-called indirect liquidity injection... The nice way to say it is liquidity management; the harsh way to put it is that there's no other way out. From 148 times to 271 times, the 121 times in between—is that faith?
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 12-16 14:30
It's the same story again—"Federal Reserve printing money = coins increase 271 times." I was just believing in it for fun... That wave in 2021 indeed skyrocketed, but can we just copy and paste to apply it now? Don't tease me. I'm optimistic about it, but directly using historical benchmarks to project multiples is too naive. Liquidity has entered, but is it really flowing into altcoins? Or has it been sucked away by BTC again? Powell says it's "technical operations," while the market calls it "disguised money printing." These two interpretations fundamentally don't match... Just don't take official statements too seriously. Having enough reserves ≠ coins rising; these two are not equal, everyone. Some people really see coins everywhere. Still, the same question: when did the Federal Reserve's money directly enter the crypto accounts? There are so many layers in between. Will it really end up in altcoins?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)