After a senior executive from a leading exchange entered a certain project, the project's attitude seemed to turn negative, and the efforts to support the price clearly diminished. Compared to the rebound momentum of other similar projects, this project is still struggling in a downward channel. From a trading perspective, short positions remain the main strategy to hedge against the selling pressure on the spot side.
Upon careful consideration, it becomes clear—can a project really sustain a valuation of tens of billions of dollars just because a certain celebrity is involved? This logic is obviously untenable. The involvement of executives can indeed boost short-term sentiment and influence the immediate market direction, but it cannot change the long-term trend of the fundamentals. The bear market cycle has already arrived, and the market is doing one thing: squeezing out unreasonable premiums and bringing prices back to their true value levels. This is actually a good opportunity for accumulation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDoctrine
· 12-17 00:51
Ha, it's the old routine of executives entering the market. They're really too lazy to support the market anymore, it's truly dead.
Short positions are piling up, and spot trading is losing badly—that's the real situation.
Can celebrity halos support billions? Wake up, everyone. Fundamentals are the true king.
In a bear market, it's just about squeezing the bubbles. Waiting to buy the dip.
This wave is really about doing subtraction. The feast for those with informational advantages is coming to an end.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-17 00:50
Can executives' entry really support billions? Wake up, everyone. I'm tired of this script of scamming retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 12-17 00:38
It's the same old script of "big shots' endorsement can make it rise"—so tiresome... The fundamentals are completely rotten, and they're too lazy to even defend the market. This is the most heartbreaking signal.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 12-17 00:34
Celebrity hype can't cover up a bad project; once support is withdrawn, the true nature is immediately revealed.
---
Short selling against spot losses—that's called self-rescue operation.
---
Relying on a single executive to support a billion-dollar market cap? Wake up, everyone.
---
A bear market is about squeezing out the bubbles, see who can survive until the rebound.
---
The fundamentals haven't changed; no matter how many celebrities endorse, it's all in vain. Sooner or later, it will return to its true value.
---
When project teams suddenly change their attitude, it's a warning sign; the signs are too obvious.
---
Lurking? I'll first see if it can survive this wave of decline.
---
Short-term sentiment can give a push, but the long-term trend can't be changed. The principle is that simple.
---
Only after the premium is fully squeezed out is the real signal for bottom-fishing; it's still early now.
After a senior executive from a leading exchange entered a certain project, the project's attitude seemed to turn negative, and the efforts to support the price clearly diminished. Compared to the rebound momentum of other similar projects, this project is still struggling in a downward channel. From a trading perspective, short positions remain the main strategy to hedge against the selling pressure on the spot side.
Upon careful consideration, it becomes clear—can a project really sustain a valuation of tens of billions of dollars just because a certain celebrity is involved? This logic is obviously untenable. The involvement of executives can indeed boost short-term sentiment and influence the immediate market direction, but it cannot change the long-term trend of the fundamentals. The bear market cycle has already arrived, and the market is doing one thing: squeezing out unreasonable premiums and bringing prices back to their true value levels. This is actually a good opportunity for accumulation.