Recently noticed an interesting wallet movement. A major exchange yesterday proposed a token portfolio worth $17.8 million to an on-chain address, and the action was quite decisive — completed within two hours.
Breaking down this holdings list is quite interesting: a mix of ETH, LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP, but the allocation logic is very clear. ETH is the absolute main force, with a position of $16.93 million accounting for 95%, and the price at the time of proposal was around $2935.55.
The remaining 5% is spread across LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP. This portfolio essentially covers the core projects of the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem — lending, oracles, DEX, governance tokens. In other words, it’s a bet on the future of established Ethereum DeFi.
However, based on the size of the proposal and the choice of tokens, this seems more like a long-term strategic layout rather than a short-term trade. So the question is: do they find the current price attractive, or are they preparing to participate in certain liquidity mining or governance voting on-chain?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PuzzledScholar
· 2025-12-20 01:56
Damn, this combination looks so familiar, I feel like I've seen it somewhere... Could it be that another big player is copying homework again?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 2025-12-17 09:44
Investing 17.8 million, this is a real show of confidence in ETH, with a 95% allocation—unusual strength.
---
Taking profits in just two hours, this pace... feels like more than just a typical position adjustment.
---
Buying all the classic DeFi projects, this guy is really betting on the Ethereum ecosystem.
---
Daring to enter with a big move now? Or has this been a planned layout for a while? The timing is interesting.
---
The question is whether LINK, AAVE, and others still have room to grow, with ETH already accounting for 95%.
---
When mentioning on-chain governance participation, could it involve some projects' voting rights battles?
---
This allocation strategy looks more like a long-term institutional target.
---
Really daring to go all-in with 95% ETH allocation.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 2025-12-17 09:30
$17.8 million on-chain in just two hours—this pace is definitely something else.
With ETH accounting for 95%, and still daring to operate like this, either they are very confident or it's really time to buy the dip.
This combination looks like a bet on DeFi recovery, but what I'm more curious about is—if you're really participating in liquidity mining, this amount is a bit unconventional.
People always try to find some clues from large transfers, but it might just be about securing a safe address.
The 95% share is indeed interesting, but from another perspective—this could be just waiting for that decisive moment.
Recently noticed an interesting wallet movement. A major exchange yesterday proposed a token portfolio worth $17.8 million to an on-chain address, and the action was quite decisive — completed within two hours.
Breaking down this holdings list is quite interesting: a mix of ETH, LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP, but the allocation logic is very clear. ETH is the absolute main force, with a position of $16.93 million accounting for 95%, and the price at the time of proposal was around $2935.55.
The remaining 5% is spread across LINK, AAVE, UNI, POL, and COMP. This portfolio essentially covers the core projects of the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem — lending, oracles, DEX, governance tokens. In other words, it’s a bet on the future of established Ethereum DeFi.
However, based on the size of the proposal and the choice of tokens, this seems more like a long-term strategic layout rather than a short-term trade. So the question is: do they find the current price attractive, or are they preparing to participate in certain liquidity mining or governance voting on-chain?