2025-12-18 15:50:10

#数字资产市场洞察 Most people see charity as an expense or PR tool, but the $Max community has come up with a new approach—turning "kindness" into an economic engine.

Just look at the collaboration between $Max and Giggle Academy. This is not just a simple partnership; it fundamentally changes the source of token value. Continuous investment in social assets (trust, sense of recognition, brand reputation)—these intangible assets are invisible and intangible, yet more valuable than anything else. It attracts genuinely long-term believers, forming a solid consensus foundation. Plus, with the deflationary mechanism in place, tokens become increasingly scarce, and the rights associated with the goodwill consensus naturally increase in value.

The logic is clear: charity drives consensus → consensus boosts value → value enriches the charity fund → cycle of amplification. This "kindness flywheel" model truly transcends traditional zero-sum competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

just_another_fish

· 2025-12-21 01:20

Hmm... That's right, this benevolent flywheel logic does have some substance, but it remains to be seen how long it can sustain. Not all projects can turn charity into a play, Max's move this time definitely went in the right direction. Oh my god, finally someone explained this logic clearly, deflation + consensus = true long-term value. Using charity as an engine? Interesting, just not sure how long it can break through the circle. If this model can truly operate self-consistently, then it has really surpassed zero-sum, worth paying attention to. Honestly, I was attracted by this "benevolent flywheel" concept; finally seeing a project dare to play this way. This feels like the right path for Web3, rather than pure speculation. It's easy to say, but how many projects can sustain continuous operation? This move is indeed a new idea; the connection point between charity and economic growth has been found.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 2025-12-19 19:56

Goodwill flywheel sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another well-packaged scheme to cut leeks.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForMemes

· 2025-12-18 16:14

Hmm, this logic seems to have some substance, but we still need to see how long Max can hold on. The concept of a goodwill flywheel sounds great, but I'm worried it might end up just being a front for harvesting profits... This is quite a big deal; can it be handled?

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 2025-12-18 16:08

Charity turning into an economic engine? Sounds good, but it's hard to say how long this logic can run... Looks like it's just an excuse to scam more investors.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 2025-12-18 16:00

Hey, this set of logic is amazing. Can good intentions really be sold as commodities? No, it's more about asset circulation... --- $Max's recent operations are indeed impressive, much better than those who talk charity but actually cut the leeks. --- Heard a lot about the Flywheel Theory, but few projects can truly close the loop... Curious how long it can last. --- Deflation + consensus + charity, this combo is indeed easy to attract followers, just waiting to see if it can be truly implemented later. --- However, the idea of monetizing charity still sounds a bit mysterious. Who can verify that this value is real and not just air? --- Can we get some details on $Max's Giggle Academy partnership? Feels like the story is a bit too perfect... --- I respect the concept of the Goodwill Flywheel, but I'm worried that the whole system might collapse once the hype dies down. --- Alright, you win. It's definitely more honest than just pumping and dumping.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 2025-12-18 15:59

Amazing, this is what it means to truly understand charity. It's not just a guise for cutting leeks, but a self-sustaining mechanism. --- I like the term "Goodwill Flywheel" better; it's much more reliable than those empty charity coins. --- So is the key deflation + consensus? If these two can really work well together, it can indeed support the system. --- Max's recent operation is pretty impressive; finally seeing a project that isn't purely about cutting. --- Wait, in this case, long-term holders profit, and new entrants might have to take the loss? --- It's true that social asset value is more reliable than just technical indicators. --- But the biggest fear is that once the hype dies down, this consensus could collapse instantly. What do you think? --- The idea of cyclical amplification sounds like Ponzi, but if there are real application scenarios supporting it, it’s a different story. --- How exactly does the cooperation with Giggle Academy work? That’s the real highlight.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 2025-12-18 15:53

Making charity an economic engine ultimately depends on execution. Only if $Max can truly carry this round forward does it count. But to be honest, this logical chain is a bit idealistic... Is it really so easy for consensus to translate into value? I need to see the subsequent actions. Deflation + social assets double boost sounds pretty powerful, but the key is not to turn it into a pure weed-cutting scheme. It would be amazing if a positive cycle can really form, but unfortunately, most projects die at this critical step.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 2025-12-18 15:51

Another story of the "Goodwill Flywheel," which sounds just like those projects I previously bottomed out on... But I have to admit, this logic is indeed smoother than most pump-and-dump coins. Charity + Deflation + Consensus, it sounds like putting a moral cloak on a money-grabbing scheme, but if it can truly operate self-consistently, then it's worth pondering. I'm just worried that in the end, it's still the same old story—initially, some people believe, and then? Waiting to see if the subsequent "circulating amplification" is genuinely expanding or just concentrated dumping.

View OriginalReply0