A few days ago, someone asked me an interesting question: "Bitcoin transactions are slow and have high fees. How can it sell for $90,000 each and have a market cap surpassing $2 trillion?" That's a good question, but if you only see it as a payment tool, it’s hard to explain.



Looking at it from a different perspective makes everything clear — think of Bitcoin as a breakthrough in human cooperation at the institutional level, and the story becomes straightforward.

**1. It’s not about efficiency; its core is "a substitute for trust"**

From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin is actually quite counterintuitive. Look at its metrics: transaction per second is nowhere near Visa, mining consumes a lot of electricity, the entire network repeatedly broadcasts and records the ledger, protocol updates are painfully slow, governance costs are high… in almost all dimensions where speed matters, it can’t compete with traditional financial systems.

But there’s a detail many overlook — the real cost in traditional finance isn’t server hardware, but people. Banks, clearing intermediaries, regulators, auditors, legal compliance, judicial systems, cross-border coordination… these "human-level blockchains" are the most expensive, most problem-prone, and hardest to scale parts of the entire financial system. One radical thing Bitcoin does is: use大量 cheap computing power to replace those expensive and unstable human trust mechanisms.

**2. The bottleneck restricting human cooperation has never been technology**

Looking back through history, before modern institutions and technology, the upper limit of human stable cooperation was roughly around 150 people. The evolution of civilization has essentially been about solving the same problem: how to enable strangers, people who don’t trust each other, to cooperate stably over the long term.

The answer isn’t "raising everyone’s moral standards," but rather — clearly defining the rules of the game, keeping accounts transparent, and setting consequences for breaches. Institutional design is the real weapon to expand the scope of human cooperation.
BTC-2,44%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessApevip
· 4h ago
Wow, someone finally explained it clearly. Those guys before were obsessing over TPS all day, and I just felt they were going in the wrong direction.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlavevip
· 22h ago
Wow, this perspective is amazing. I've always thought of BTC as a payment tool, but switching to a trust mechanism substitute instantly makes everything clear.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 01-06 08:23
This perspective indeed opens up new horizons. According to this logic, the value of Bitcoin lies not in throughput but in eliminating intermediary cost structures. It is worth noting that, according to the latest data, the global financial intermediary costs account for about 15-20%, while the costs of the Bitcoin network are relatively transparent and decreasing. This explains from an economic perspective why the market capitalization can surpass 2 trillion—essentially a release of institutional redemptive benefits.
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybevip
· 01-05 03:55
Well said, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. The essence of Bitcoin is to use cryptography to eliminate middlemen, avoiding explosive trust costs.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 01-05 03:54
Wow, someone finally explained this clearly. I argued about this with someone before.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-05 03:53
ngl this trust replacement angle actually hits different... been liquidated enough times to know how much that "stable intermediary" thing costs us. watch those health factors tho fr
Reply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 01-05 03:52
ngl, this "trust replacement" angle actually checks out when you map it against the 2008 collapse pattern. we literally watched the entire middleman layer implode, and bitcoin's whole thing was basically saying "yeah, we don't need those people anymore." statistically speaking, that's exactly how institutional trust dies before something new fills the void. history rhymes fr.
Reply0
LayerHoppervip
· 01-05 03:47
Wow, this angle is amazing. I always thought BTC was just a payment tool, but it turns out the core is about replacing intermediaries.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullTherapistvip
· 01-05 03:38
Awesome, finally someone has explained this clearly. It's not about how fast the technology is, but how costly trust really is.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)