2026-01-07 03:23:27

Recently, there has been some movement again. The WLFI deployment address has recharged a top-tier exchange for the second time in just three weeks, this time pouring in 24 million $WLFI tokens, which is roughly equivalent to 4.14 million USD at current market rates. What is the logic behind this continuous recharging operation? Is it preparing for large sell pressure, or are there other fund arrangements? The market has always been quite sensitive to such large entry signals, after all, what does this level of token flow to exchanges usually imply? Many traders are watching similar on-chain data, trying to sniff out some hints of the trend.

WLFI-2,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiSherpa

· 3h ago

Three weeks, two recharges. This pace is a bit rushed; it feels like something's going to go wrong.

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 21h ago

Another 24 million coins dumped? This pace doesn't feel right, sending coins to the exchange twice in three weeks...

View OriginalReply0

GhostWalletSleuth

· 01-07 03:53

Hmm... this rhythm is a bit strange, twice in three weeks? It doesn't seem like simple selling pressure.

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-07 03:52

$41.4 million invested at once, this pace is a bit aggressive, gotta keep a close eye on it.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-07 03:51

$4.14 million USD was spent twice in three weeks, this is not "arranged," it's testing the exchange's depth [dog head] Continuous recharges are truly impressive. Friends waiting to catch the last relay baton should be careful. Another "hidden arbitrage opportunity"? Please don’t be fooled by on-chain data. The big players have already been laughing in the shadows. This technique looks familiar. A certain protocol used to do the same, and as a result, the TVL evaporated by half. $24 million tokens were dumped at once. Based on the exchange’s absorption capacity, is this a sell-off or just a fake move? We need to check the wallet address’s historical transaction records. Let’s think differently: more recharge times ≠ a sell signal. It could also mean a large buyer is backing the purchase. The truth is often more complex than on-chain data.

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 01-07 03:51

This move... pouring in 24 million tokens directly, it's indeed a bit aggressive.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 01-07 03:48

Hmm... This move looks like setting up a trap; continuously pouring in without a plan is impossible.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper